Game-changer or irresponsible? The known unknowns on Australia’s nuclear submarine deal

Analysis: Stay tuned as we battle the notoriously secret defence establishment to work out what we are getting and when, and maybe why and whether it’s worth it

It started, as defence stories so often do, with an acronym. Australians woke up on Thursday morning to Aukus – a new Australia/United Kingdom/United States alliance formed to tackle the rising threat of China.

(Aukus studiously avoided the ‘C’ word, but we all know that’s what they were thinking).

News of the three-way alliance born at the June G7 trilateral came with the shock announcement that Australia would scrap its existing $90bn submarine project in favour of nuclear-powered boats. Instead of 12 French-design submarines, Australia will get “at least eight” designed in the UK or the US and built in Adelaide.

The backlash was swift. New Zealand – which was left out of the gang – will continue its nuclear-free policy and ban any nuclear-powered submarines from its waters. The Greens and anti-nuclear campaigners were scathing.

Paris called it a “stab in the back”. France said it had no warning of the deal, and heard about it from the media. Then, French officials were told their US counterparts were unavailable to meet.

“We only heard about it yesterday,” the armed forces minister, Florence Parly, told RFI radio.

The Australian prime minister, Scott Morrison, said he discussed it with the French president, Emmanuel Macron, after the G7.

Beijing called it “extremely irresponsible”.

It was a lot to take in. But, to channel Donald Rumsfeld, those are the known knowns. There’ll be plenty more to come as we try to answer the known unknowns.

What are we getting?

If the new plan, unlike the old plan, goes to plan, we will get a fleet of nuclear-powered submarines. At least we know how they work.

We do not know yet if they will be based on a UK or a US design, but it is more than likely they will be powered by the sort of reactor in the US Virginia-class submarines.


Let’s put to one side the broader question about Australia’s role in and obligation to global stability and to keeping the US happy.

Sign up to receive the top stories from Guardian Australia every morning

Plenty of defence pundits have been arguing that we need the stealth and reach of nuclear submarines, instead of the diesel-electric ones we ended up ordering. The idea has usually been quashed by the government because we don’t have sovereign nuclear capabilities. Apparently that doesn’t matter any more. (Or does it?)

Guardian Australia’s political editor, Katharine Murphy, stepped us through the factors that led to the decision, and the unknown long-term ramifications. The former defence minister Christopher Pyne said new technology that means they never have to be refuelled was a “game-changer” that led to Australia’s decision.

And yet, the decision was made in secret, and came as a global shock. The government may have sealed the deal quickly, but there is still a lot to unwrap.

What about the jobs?

Morrison promises there will be a job bonanza for everyone, but funnily enough some people feel a little insecure. Naval Group Australia employs about 350 people, who will be looking for new gigs. There are companies that have geared up to supply goods to Naval Group that do not know if they will be left like the proverbial shags.

The government says the new (proposed) submarines will have 40% local content, compared to the 60% promised by Naval Group.

And there will be fewer boats built, too.

Still, Australia has a historical shortage of submariners, so at least they will be in high demand.

Show me the money.

Australia has already spent $2.4bn on the now-scrapped project – Morrison says the money was not wasted, although it was dedicated to the building of a very different boat. To get out of the contract will cost hundreds of millions (but we don’t know yet if France might have legal recourse to get some more compensation).

That’s a lot of money. You know what else will cost a lot of money? At least eight new submarines. And no, we don’t know how much.

How quickly can this new military-industrial endeavour swing into action?

One of the enduring concerns about the future fleet was that it was going to take so long to get them operational, we would have to stretch out Australia’s existing Collins-class fleet with extensive refits. We will still have to do that.

First there will be an 18-month study to work out the plan. And it will be a decade before the boats start to hit the water. So at this stage, when it comes to the timeline, we are pretty much where we were before.

So, stay tuned as we battle the notoriously secret defence establishment to work out what we are getting for our taxpayer dollars, and when, and maybe why, and whether it’s worth it, and whether we have irreparably damaged our relationship with France, and by extension, with Europe.

Still, at least we know the basics. Such as the name of our prime minister. Even if the US president maybe doesn’t.


Tory Shepherd

The GuardianTramp

Related Content

Article image
Australia nuclear submarine deal: Aukus defence pact with US and UK means $90bn contract with France will be scrapped
Scott Morrison says nuclear-powered submarines will be built in Adelaide under the Aukus framework announced with Joe Biden and Boris Johnson

Katharine Murphy and Daniel Hurst

16, Sep, 2021 @1:41 AM

Article image
Diplomacy dialled up to 11: Australia saddles up with US as Indo-Pacific heads for cold war | Katharine Murphy
Australia didn’t announce the ‘forever partnership’ while Donald Trump was in the White House. What happens if he returns?

Katharine Murphy

16, Sep, 2021 @9:40 AM

Article image
Morrison expects US to ramp up military presence in region as China attacks ‘irresponsible’ defence pact
Beijing denounces Aukus pact, raising question of nuclear proliferation, as Morrison expects a greater US military presence in Indo-Pacific and deeper UK defence ties

Daniel Hurst and Katharine Murphy

16, Sep, 2021 @10:34 AM

Article image
The nuclear option: why has Australia ditched the French submarine plan for the Aukus pact?
Just two weeks before the bombshell, senior ministers from both countries met and declared they were ‘committed to cooperation’. How did it all go so wrong?

Daniel Hurst

17, Sep, 2021 @8:00 PM

Article image
Essential poll: majority of Australians back Aukus submarine pact, but fear it will inflame tensions with China
Coalition has 13-point lead over Labor on voter trust to handle national security, while ALP has 13-point lead on managing climate crisis

Katharine Murphy Political editor

27, Sep, 2021 @9:26 PM

Article image
Joe Biden if president will push allies like Australia to do more on climate, adviser says
Jake Sullivan says the former vice-president, if elected, won’t ‘pull any punches’ on what is a global problem

Daniel Hurst

07, Sep, 2020 @9:25 AM

Article image
What are nuclear-powered submarines, anyway? A guide to Australia’s looming military addition
How do they work? What are the pros and cons? We break down the technology in the defence deal with the US and UK

Royce Kurmelovs

16, Sep, 2021 @6:53 AM

Article image
Australia’s foreign minister to meet French ambassador in bid to heal submarine rift
Marise Payne says she regrets France’s ‘deep disappointment’, as tension with Indonesia over Aukus deal revealed

Daniel Hurst

28, Oct, 2021 @4:39 AM

Article image
Aukus pact: UK and US battle to contain international backlash
Nuclear submarine deal with Australia draws criticism from allies and China amid fears of conflict

Dan Sabbagh, Julian Borger, Helen Davidson and Angelique Chrisafis

16, Sep, 2021 @7:48 PM

Article image
‘Someone lied’: French foreign minister accuses Australia of submarine betrayal in latest broadside
Jean-Yves Le Drian says Australia reassured France everything was fine right up to the day the Aukus pact was announced

Kim Willsher in Paris and Daniel Hurst in Canberra

30, Sep, 2021 @6:56 AM