Australian businesses ‘hungry’ to pay farmers to protect biodiversity in world-first scheme, says Littleproud

Agriculture minister says Australia will be the first to reward farmers for reducing emissions and improving biodiversity on their land

The agriculture minister, David Littleproud, has declared Australian business is “hungry” to pay farmers to protect biodiversity under a “world-first” scheme designed to reward environmental improvements alongside emissions reduction.

Last week’s federal budget included funding for a multi-stage agriculture biodiversity stewardship package that aims to make it attractive for farmers to both reduce greenhouse gas emissions and lift biodiversity protection on their land.

The goal in part is to create a climate and environment policy that appeals to farmers and will not be criticised by Coalition MPs otherwise opposed to steps to reduce emissions.

Speaking on the ABC’s RN Breakfast on Tuesday, Littleproud said Australia would be the first jurisdiction in the world to measure and reward improvement in biodiversity on farming land.

He said it would offer farmers who had been approved to generate carbon credits through projects to reduce emissions – such as restoring or not removing vegetation – an extra upfront premium payment for additional steps that also emphasised biodiversity protection.

It could require them to plant a mix of species consistent with the landscape, and manage and look after the vegetation.

One of the architects of the scheme, the Australian National University environmental policy specialist Prof Andrew Macintosh, said it was expected the carbon credits would be attractive to companies that wanted to buy them as offsets and also be able to say they were helping to look after the natural environment.

“I see the real attraction in the high-value voluntary carbon market, where a business needs the credits and wants a positive story to go with them,” Macintosh said.

The voluntary carbon market – basically, companies buying credits to meet self-imposed emissions reduction targets – has grown significantly over the past five years from about 25,000 credits sold in 2015 to more than 700,000. Macintosh said it was growing dramatically as more businesses set net zero emissions reduction goals.

The upfront premium paid by the government under the “carbon + biodiversity pilot” program is determined using a model that calculates the number of credits likely to be generated and sold over the life of a project, and that aims to provide an undisclosed rate of return to the farmer.

Littleproud discussed the development of the $34m pilot with Guardian Australia in March. He told the ABC on Tuesday “it’s an extra payment on top of the [emissions reduction fund] that would be able to be traded with the business sector, who are very hungry for this type of product”.

“Because we are the first ones in the world to be able to measure the improvement in biodiversity, that adds the social licence that companies are looking for and it rewards farmers for their stewardship,” he said.

Macintosh said the eventual goal was that it would create a stand alone market for biodiversity credits independent of the carbon component, reflecting that developments were often approved with biodiversity offset requirements.

Two reports last year – by the Australian National Audit Office and the former competition watchdog Graeme Samuel – found the current practice of using environmental offsets to allow development approvals was deeply flawed.

The budget included $4.4m to create a biodiversity trading platform – effectively, an online bulletin board where landowners could offer their biodiversity-enhanced carbon credits (and eventually straight biodiversity credits) for sale to interested businesses.

It also promised $5.4m for the creation of a voluntary Australian farm biodiversity certification scheme that would allow farmers to stamp their goods as environmentally friendly. Littleproud said the expectation was this would lead to products getting a premium “in places like the EU and UK, where they are wanting these types of programs”.

The government committed $22.3m for a pilot program to protect what is known as enhanced remnant vegetation – existing high value native plant life and ecosystems on their property.

Under this scheme, landowners would be offered a contract with rolling payments for steps including installing fencing, weeding, pest control and replanting. Macintosh said the goal was to bring national consistency to incentives that differed across the states.

Littleproud said the idea of a biodiversity market was in its infancy, and the government was having conversations with the Business Council of Australia “about what that’ll look like”.

The Australian Conservation Foundation said giving farmers incentives to plant native vegetation would encourage biodiversity and help store carbon in the landscape, but called on the government ensure there was not a “perverse incentive” for landowners to clear vegetation from their land before joining the program.

Basha Stasak, the foundation’s nature program manager, said Australia was a world leader in extinction and deforestation. “What’s most important is that any such program delivers genuine gains to biodiversity over the long term,” she said.

“This pilot should provide useful evidence about what actually delivers benefits for nature, so those measures can be adopted more widely.”

Farmers for Climate Action said establishing a platform to trade biodiversity and carbon credits from revegetation was a good step. Fiona Davis, the Farmers for Climate Action interim chief executive, said: “We are encouraged by minister Littleproud’s growing commitment to net zero emissions and believe the program has real potential.”


Adam Morton Environment editor

The GuardianTramp

Related Content

Article image
Let's end Australia's climate and energy warfare, Albanese tells Morrison
Labor leader sets out policy pivot in challenge to PM to display genuine bipartisanship

Katharine Murphy Political editor

23, Jun, 2020 @5:30 PM

Article image
Tony Burke floats Green New Deal-style approach to Labor's climate policy
Shadow environment minister says ALP can’t keep pushing a market mechanism to reduce emissions nor could it ‘give up’ on tackling crisis

Katharine Murphy Political editor

23, May, 2019 @6:00 AM

Article image
Q&A recap: business council calls for legislated target of net zero emissions by 2050
Jennifer Westacott, the BCA chief, tells audience Australia should aim to meet 2030 targets without using Kyoto carryover credits

Lisa Cox and Adam Morton

10, Feb, 2020 @8:22 PM

Article image
Liberal MPs pour cold water on inquiry backed by Frydenberg into bank lending for coal projects
Andrew Bragg and Tim Wilson say inquiry is unnecessary because it’s a legitimate ‘matter for those institutions’

Paul Karp

16, Dec, 2020 @6:14 AM

Article image
Greens blast key part of Labor's climate policy as 'fake action'
Party says allowing heavy polluters to use international permits to meet emissions reduction targets allows companies to ‘keep polluting at home’

Katharine Murphy and Lisa Cox

01, Apr, 2019 @7:56 AM

Article image
Business Council of Australia backs Zali Steggall's climate change bill for 2050 net zero target
Group hails ‘science-based, risk-management’ approach as world heads towards net zero emissions

Adam Morton Environment editor

26, Jan, 2021 @5:56 AM

Article image
Carbon tariffs: what are they and what could they mean for Australia?
Several major economies and Australian trading partners are looking at introducing them. Adam Morton explains why

Adam Morton Environment editor

12, Feb, 2021 @7:00 PM

Article image
Australian government stokes fears that Europe’s new carbon levy could hurt jobs
Dan Tehan criticises tarffs as ‘just a new form of protectionism’ despite Australia’s major exports being mostly spared in initial stage

Daniel Hurst Foreign affairs and defence correspondent

14, Jul, 2021 @10:24 PM

Article image
Australian businesses, unions and farmers say Paris agreement requires zero emissions plan
Australia Climate Roundtable says climate goals require ‘deep global emissions reductions’

Adam Morton and Katharine Murphy

05, Dec, 2019 @2:43 AM

Article image
Big-emitting Australian businesses could soon face costly carbon levy in Europe
If the Morrison government does not impose emissions reduction policies, exporters may need to buy carbon permits in the EU

Adam Morton Environment editor

10, Feb, 2021 @4:30 PM