Broadcaster Ray Hadley criticises Howard and Abbott for supporting Pell

Conservatives split over cardinal’s crimes, as legal expert says questioning the verdict could deter victims from seeking justice

The broadcaster Ray Hadley has criticised former Liberal prime ministers John Howard and Tony Abbott for expressing sympathy with George Pell, warning that to doubt the verdict is to call the cardinal’s victim a liar.

The conservative broadcaster told 2GB Radio on Thursday Howard had gone “way over the top” by providing a “gushing reference”.

“It’s my opinion Mr Abbott and Mr Howard have made gross errors of judgment,” Hadley said, noting that paedophiles escaped punishment because they hid their crimes and “con their friends and colleagues”.

“This is not over, there is an appeal process. For someone as prominent as Mr Howard to basically say the victim’s a liar and Pell’s not, is not what it should be about.”

On Thursday morning the head of a child sexual abuse legal service also condemned columnists who have expressed their disbelief in the verdict, warning it sends an “incredibly damaging message to survivors”.

Warren Strange, the executive officer of Knowmore legal service, told a parliamentary inquiry he expected the “unprecedented” publicity around the Pell case to drive a spike in claims but media commentary doubting the verdict might deter victims from seeking justice.

After Pell’s conviction, revealed on Tuesday, of one count of sexual penetration and four counts of indecent assault against two 13-year-old choirboys, several commentators including News Corp’s Miranda Devine and Andrew Bolt declared their belief in Pell’s innocence.

Pell has also been defended by Howard, in a glowing character reference labelling him a “person of both high intelligence and exemplary character”. Abbott has revealed he called Pell after the verdict and indirectly supported him by continuing to call the cardinal his friend.

On Thursday a parliamentary joint committee met in Canberra to hear evidence on the effectiveness of the victims’ redress scheme set up after the institutional child sexual abuse royal commission.

Strange told the hearing that Knowmore had already seen “a number people contacting us across the last couple of days as the result” of the Pell case, explaining they were “not just survivors who experience abuse in a Catholic institution, it can elevate survivors from any context”.

“I expect there will be an impact. Certainly whenever there is that level of attention – and this [case] is perhaps unprecedented – whenever there has been significant media attention we tend to see a spike in calls,” he said.

Senator Derryn Hinch suggested that particular media articles doubting the verdict could deter victims, citing the fact that many do not come forward because they fear they will not be believed.

Strange said that he is “deeply concerned” about those articles, accusing commentators of “attempting to traverse the verdict of the jury who had the benefit of sitting in court and hearing all the evidence”.

“And with due respect to those columnists, the defence team for the particular accused was better able to point to all the circumstances and to argue the case for an acquittal – and that didn’t happen, the jury’s verdict has come in,” he said.

“To then say I don’t believe it, or it’s wrong, I think that sends an incredibly damaging message to survivors who are thinking about coming forward.

“They must be thinking, some of them will be thinking ‘why would I do this, why would I put myself through a process like that then run the risk of public criticism’ for an outcome we’ve seen.

“I think it can potentially be very, very damaging to survivors to be writing those types of stories.”

Hinch also took aim at defence barrister Robert Richter’s submissions in relation to sentencing that Pell’s offences were “plain vanilla offending”, labelling it “absolutely offensive”.

Strange suggested that measuring sexual assault by metrics such as the duration of the offence is “devastating for survivors”.

“They don’t see things through the same lens, that [conduct is] not at the worst possible scale of offending – it’s irrelevant to them.”

Strange told the hearing that one cause of the delay in claims is that some “major institutions” have yet to join.

The department of social services has started to publish a list of institutions that are yet to join the redress scheme. Currently there are more than 100 organisations which were named in the royal commission that are yet to join.

The social services minister Paul Fletcher said the decision to name the institutions will provide transparency for abuse survivors considering applying for redress payments, but the government also expects those not named in the royal commission to join.

Departmental officials told the hearing the majority of institutions had now responded giving a timeframe to join the scheme but some had not received the initiative to name and shame them well.

It was last week revealed 51 Australians have received payments through the scheme, receiving on average $79,035. Officials blamed delays on many institutions only joining the scheme in December.

Contributor

Paul Karp

The GuardianTramp

Related Content

Article image
‘Why didn’t he help those little boys?’: how George Pell failed the children of Ballarat
The cardinal maintains he didn’t know about the Victorian town’s notorious paedophile priests, a claim the royal commission found ‘implausible’

Melissa Davey

08, May, 2020 @10:21 PM

Article image
Pell says meeting with Australia abuse survivors was 'hard and honest'
Australia’s most senior Catholic meets 12 survivors of sexual abuse by priests in his native Ballarat

Stephanie Kirchgaessner in Rome

03, Mar, 2016 @4:58 PM

Article image
Police send sexual abuse brief about George Pell to prosecutors
Australia’s most senior Catholic denies all allegations of abuse, which will be reviewed by Department of Public Prosecutions

Melissa Davey

07, Feb, 2017 @12:16 AM

Article image
Cardinal George Pell calls child abuse allegations a smear campaign
ABC reports on year-long investigation into allegations Pell abused children in Ballarat, Torquay and Melbourne

Guardian staff

27, Jul, 2016 @10:19 AM

Article image
Cardinal George Pell: Victoria police to assess unredacted royal commission findings
Solicitor who acted for victims at inquiry says police must investigate findings that Pell knew priests were abusing children but failed to act

Melissa Davey

07, May, 2020 @6:25 AM

Article image
Tony Abbott declines to call for George Pell's return for child abuse commission
PM says ‘ultimately, it’s a matter for him’ whether the cardinal returns from the Vatican to address claims made against him at child sex abuse royal commission

Katharine Murphy Deputy political editor

21, May, 2015 @2:33 AM

Article image
Police investigating George Pell over fresh child sexual abuse allegation – report
News Corp says acquitted cardinal faces new claims over alleged incident in the 1970s when he was a priest in Ballarat

Melissa Davey

14, Apr, 2020 @3:05 AM

Article image
Cardinal Pell had evidence to act on paedophile priest, royal commission counsel say
Submission says Pell missed the opportunity to deal with Peter Searson, and his evidence that he was intentionally deceived should be rejected

Melissa Davey and agencies

31, Oct, 2016 @2:12 AM

Article image
George Pell: cardinal was aware of children being sexually abused, royal commission report finds
Previously redacted findings from the commission’s report into Pell’s handling of child sexual abuse claims have now been made public

Melissa Davey

07, May, 2020 @12:29 AM

Article image
'He should have done more': key findings from the newly released George Pell reports
Two case studies reveal the full extent of the Cardinal’s knowledge of sexual abuse within the Catholic church. Here’s what they tell us

Melissa Davey

07, May, 2020 @9:21 AM