News Corp columnists declare Cardinal Pell innocent and 'a scapegoat'

Andrew Bolt and Miranda Devine say Cardinal George Pell’s conviction was wrongful and ‘accusations are implausible’

Rupert Murdoch’s Australian mastheads have published several prominent articles defending the convicted child molester George Pell and casting doubt on the jury’s unanimous verdict in Melbourne’s county court.

News Corp columnists Andrew Bolt and Miranda Devine led the charge in Wednesday’s papers, characterising the guilty verdict as a wrongful conviction and likening it to when Lindy Chamberlain was wrongfully jailed for murdering her baby Azaria, and describing it as the OJ Simpson case “in reverse”.

“Declaration: I have met Pell perhaps five times in my life and like him,” Bolt wrote. “I am not a Catholic or even a Christian. He is a scapegoat, not a child abuser. In my opinion.”

Although Melbourne’s Herald Sun proudly pointed to a front page report by Lucie Morris-Marr from 2016 which revealed Pell was under investigation, it also published an extraordinary piece by Bolt attacking the successful prosecution case as “flimsy”.

“In my opinion, this is our own OJ Simpson case, but in reverse. A man was found guilty not on the facts but on prejudice,” Bolt wrote.

“Cardinal George Pell has been falsely convicted of sexually abusing two boys in their early teens. That’s my opinion, based on the overwhelming evidence.”

Tomorrow’s @theheraldsun front page tonight #springst #auspol @s_deery pic.twitter.com/O3RsxEGLXm

— damon johnston (@damonheraldsun) February 26, 2019

On his Sky News program Bolt said Pell was a man “who’s been made to pay for the sins made by his church”.

After Morris-Marr left the Herald Sun in 2016, she accused News Corp of not renewing her contract because of a dispute with Bolt over the Pell story. Bolt wrote a column in the same paper calling it a “vicious” smear that formed part of a “sinister” campaign.

In her nationally syndicated column in the Daily Telegraph, Miranda Devine said the victim’s “accusations are implausible” and Pell was innocent.

Devine, a Catholic, has always been a strong supporter of Pell. In 2017 she alleged that his charges were drummed up by Victoria police as a distraction from a supposed crime epidemic.

“Victoria police chief Graham Ashton desperate for a distraction from the crime epidemic he’s incapable of stopping #HuntingCatholics,” she said on Twitter.

Unsurprisingly there's one story dominating the front pages today.#MediaWatch pic.twitter.com/XBYaWSyoNZ

— Media Watch (@ABCmediawatch) February 26, 2019

On Wednesday Devine said the verdict was devastating and Pell was a big scalp for the “rotten Vatican”.

“It’s devastating because I don’t believe that Pell, who I know slightly and admire greatly, could be guilty of sexually assaulting two choirboys in a busy cathedral after Sunday mass when he was archbishop of Melbourne in 1996,” Devine wrote in the Daily Telegraph.”

Murdoch’s national broadsheet, the Australian, took the unusual decision to publish on the front page two critics who argued the victim’s testimony was improbable. The legal academic and vice chancellor of the Australian Catholic University, Greg Craven, blamed the police and the media, in particular the ABC journalist Louise Milligan, who wrote a Walkley-award winning book on Pell.

Brutal. pic.twitter.com/raoF7xFcJP

— @NewtonMark@mastodon.social (@NewtonMark) February 26, 2019

“This is where the Pell case has gone terribly wrong,” Craven wrote. “Impartial judge and jury [excepted], parts of the media – notably the ABC and former Fairfax journalists – have spent years attempting to ensure Pell is the most odious figure in Australia.

“They seemed to want him in the dock as an ogre, not a defendant.

“So what we have witnessed is a combined effort by much of the media, including the public broadcaster, and elements of Victoria’s law enforcement agency, to blacken the name of someone before he went to trial.”

Craven was one of 10 people to give character references for Pell before sentencing.

The Jesuit priest and human rights lawyer Frank Brennan, who attended some of the trial, argued the victim’s evidence – given behind closed doors – was “confused” and the jury must have discarded the defence’s compelling arguments.

“The proposition that the offences charged were committed immediately after mass by a fully robed archbishop in the sacristy with an open door and in full view from the corridor seemed incredible to my mind,” Brennan wrote.

A senior journalist, John Ferguson, who did not cover the trial, was also not convinced.

“As unpopular as Pell is in the secular community, indeed among many Catholics, there are valid questions to be asked about whether the jury got it right,” Ferguson wrote in an analysis piece on an inside page. “This task is made difficult by the fact the sole living accuser from the cathedral scandal did not give public evidence.

“Is it believable that Pell would so recklessly and aggressively rape and molest in a cathedral, knowing there was a high risk of being caught? Is it plausible that he committed these crimes while engineering the Melbourne Response to help compensate abuse victims?

“Is it probable beyond reasonable doubt that Pell did this?”

Contributor

Amanda Meade

The GuardianTramp

Related Content

Article image
Sky News ads go dark as Andrew Bolt defends ‘innocent’ George Pell | The Weekly Beast
Broadcaster pulls advertisements from The Bolt Report to protect brands’ reputations. Plus: the Neighbours theme tune gets a Mardi Gras remix

Amanda Meade

01, Mar, 2019 @12:32 AM

Article image
News Corp reporter 'went through hell' after Andrew Bolt attacked her Pell story
Lucie Morris-Marr hits out at Herald Sun on Twitter, alleging she was forced out after she complained about a column

Christopher Knaus

27, Dec, 2016 @1:14 AM

Article image
Cardinal George Pell: Victoria police to assess unredacted royal commission findings
Solicitor who acted for victims at inquiry says police must investigate findings that Pell knew priests were abusing children but failed to act

Melissa Davey

07, May, 2020 @6:25 AM

Article image
Cardinal George Pell suppression order: 36 journalists and companies to appear in court
Victorian prosecutors have asked court to find respondents guilty of contempt on the basis of ‘scandalising the court’

Amanda Meade

26, Mar, 2019 @4:25 AM

Article image
Cardinal George Pell writes about suffering, jail and coronavirus in News Corp piece
Cardinal writes in the Australian that ‘God-fearers’ are better able to deal with evil and suffering than atheists

Christopher Knaus with agencies

11, Apr, 2020 @1:40 AM

Article image
Cardinal George Pell to spend nearly four years in jail for child sexual assault
Chief judge calls Pell’s crimes ‘breathtakingly arrogant’ as he sentences Pell to six years in jail, with non-parole period of three years and eight months

Melissa Davey

13, Mar, 2019 @12:29 AM

Article image
Inside the Pell trial: we sat in court for months, forbidden from reporting a word
When the verdict came, the room was still. No one made a sound

Melissa Davey

26, Feb, 2019 @1:00 PM

Article image
George Pell: news organisations fined more than $1m over reporting of sexual abuse verdict
Victoria’s supreme court fines the Age $450,000 and News Corp more than $400,000 for contempt of court over coverage of cardinal’s initial conviction

Michael McGowan

04, Jun, 2021 @1:25 AM

Article image
George Pell appeal: cardinal's victim not a liar or fantasist, court told
Prosecutor says victim was a ‘compelling witness’ and he wouldn’t have been able to describe the sacristy layout if he was lying

Melissa Davey

06, Jun, 2019 @1:38 AM

Article image
George Pell has good chance of winning appeal against convictions, expert says
Law professor says overturning the verdict on the basis of unreasonableness is ‘the defence’s best shot’

Melissa Davey

28, Feb, 2019 @5:24 AM