Political parties' postal vote mailouts spark concerns voters could be misled

Experts question if voters are fully aware they are sending their forms back to the parties

Within 24 hours of the federal election being called some Australians began receiving application forms for postal votes. The mostly unmarked envelopes didn’t come from the electoral commission, but from local candidates and political parties which enclosed information about their policies and an addressed reply-paid envelope.

The practice is not new for political campaigners but, with increasing concerns about privacy and data collection, some voters are questioning a lack of transparency about exactly what they’re up to.

In many cases the envelopes have no branding and contain electioneering material. There’s nothing illegal in that – electoral legislation allows for a candidate or political party to send out postal vote applications and include material they wish to send to voters.

In the case of several Liberal candidate mailouts, the letters spruik Coalition policies and warn against Labor’s. They end with a “PS I’ve included Postal Vote forms if you’re unable to vote on polling day”.

When the voter sends the form back, the receiver is required to on-forward it to the electoral commission “as soon as practicable”, according to Phil Diak, the Australian Electoral Commission’s director of media and issues management.

“That’s the point where the involvement of the party or candidate ends. The AEC, having received the application, then sends the postal pack containing ballot papers direct to the voter.”

Voters can send their application forms directly to the AEC, Diak said, and the AEC was urging people to consider the material they received.

Please note that political parties are allowed to send postal vote applications to electors, however you don’t have to use it. Or you can return it directly to us. (1 of 4) pic.twitter.com/SgwY3RSmNj

— AEC (@AusElectoralCom) April 13, 2019

The concerns are around whether voters – particularly older people – are fully aware they are sending their forms back to political parties and what the parties are then doing with the information.

Prof Jay Wanna, an expert in Australian politics and public policy, said parties are “nudging forward” the allowable process in order to gather more data on local voters.

Addresses on the reply paid envelopes are sometimes vaguely identified and don’t clearly alert recipients they’ll be sending their form to a party campaign office, which Wanna said was not “in the spirit of the legislation”.

“The concern is people aren’t being asked, they’re being misled,” Wanna told Guardian Australia.

“There are 10 criteria [to be allowed a postal vote],” he said. The forms also sought security information to ensure people’s identity, such as “who they work for, where they were born. They get your mobile phone and your email address,” said Wanna.

Wanna said the most valuable information gained by the parties was likely people’s mobile phone numbers, particularly as many would be zoned by electorate.

The knowledge of who had applied to postal vote also allowed parties to plan doorknocking, he said.

Wanna also suspects candidates and parties sent out letters early. Scott Morrison called the election on the morning of 11 February, but Guardian Australia has been contacted by readers who received letters from their local MP or candidate as early as that afternoon.

Wanna said legislation needs to be amended – something which happens several times during a parliament – to tighten up requirements.

The independent MP Rebekha Sharkie told ABC radio she wants political parties removed from the postal voting process because “most people didn’t realise” they were sending their data to campaigns, not the commission.

Applications for postal votes close on 15 May, and ballot papers must be completed and witnessed on or before election day, on Saturday 18 May.


Helen Davidson

The GuardianTramp

Related Content

Article image
False election claims spark push for truth in political advertising laws
Integrity campaigners say falsehoods spread through campaign, particularly by United Australia party ads, are ‘intolerable’

Christopher Knaus and Nick Evershed

20, May, 2019 @5:20 AM

Article image
'No one can assume': who will independents back if there is a hung parliament?
Rebekha Sharkie and Zali Steggall have indicated they will support the Coalition but other election candidates are hedging their bets

Sarah Martin Chief political correspondent

30, Apr, 2019 @10:00 PM

Article image
Adani mine: emails revealing pressure on CSIRO spark calls to review approval
Agency had one afternoon to accept government’s approval of Adani groundwater plan, emails reveal

Lisa Cox

14, May, 2019 @1:45 AM

Article image
Major parties stare down election eligibility questions in two Victorian marginal seats
Labor denies Deakin candidate Shireen Morris has dual citizenship while Liberals say Higgins’ Katie Allen has resigned from her research role

Paul Karp

07, May, 2019 @7:06 AM

Article image
Liquor and gaming lobby pumped more than $1m into Liberal, Labor and far-right parties
Australian Hotels Association gave highest amount in seven years, with bulk going to Liberal and National parties

Christopher Knaus

28, Apr, 2019 @6:00 PM

Article image
'They don't want to talk about politics': Braddon and Bass voters resist starring role
The Coalition desperately needs to win the two volatile electorates in Tasmania’s north, but all parties are battling disillusion and disengagement,
writes Adam Morton

Adam Morton

12, May, 2019 @12:25 AM

Article image
Moderate Liberal MPs sign on to crossbench-led climate action group
Parliamentary Friends of Climate Action aims to serve as a safe place for climate policy, away from ‘partisan politics’

Amy Remeikis

09, Oct, 2019 @5:00 PM

Article image
Essential poll: majority of voters think Bill Shorten will be the winner on Saturday
Labor ahead of the Coalition in the final Guardian Essential poll of the 2019 election campaign

Katharine Murphy Political editor

15, May, 2019 @6:00 PM

Article image
John Alexander says he still doesn't know if he's a British citizen
Liberal MP faces barrage of media questions but says he’s still waiting for definitive advice from UK authorities

Christopher Knaus and Katharine Murphy

10, Nov, 2017 @7:24 AM

Article image
David Feeney says he may hold dual citizenship as more MPs’ futures in balance
Labor MP admits he may face high court as new disclosures raise questions over status of six more lower house MPs

Katharine Murphy, Paul Karp and Gareth Hutchens

05, Dec, 2017 @8:29 AM