Offshore detention cost taxpayers $5bn in four years – and asylum seekers remain in limbo

Vigils to mark anniversary of Kevin Rudd’s banning of asylum seekers who arrive by boat from ever settling in Australia

Four years since the then prime minister, Kevin Rudd, announced that “any asylum seeker who arrives in Australia by boat will have no chance of being settled in Australia”, offshore detention has cost Australian taxpayers almost $5bn and the future of those held on Nauru and Manus Island remains critically uncertain.

On 19 July 2013, Rudd announced all boat-borne asylum seekers would be subject to indefinite detention offshore and would never be eligible to settle in Australia.

Despite consistent revelations of physical violence – including murder – sexual abuse of women and children, allegations of torture by guards, medical neglect leading to death and catastrophic rates of mental health damage, self-harm and suicide attempts, both of Australia’s offshore processing centres remain operational.

Roughly 2,000 people remain on Australia’s offshore processing islands of Nauru and Manus, and figures released under Senate estimates questioning show that the two camps have cost $4.895bn to build and run.

All of the costs are borne by Australia, which maintains effective control over both centres.

The Manus centre – ruled illegal by Papua New Guinea’s supreme court 15 months ago – will close on 31 October under pressure from the PNG government and from the private contractors running the centre, who have refused to continue working there.

The Nauru camp will continue to run but that country’s government has consistently refused to offer permanent resettlement to refugees, instead offering 20-year visas with restrictions on travel.

The proposed resolution for Australia’s offshore refugee population, the US deal to resettle refugees from Australia’s Nauru and Manus operations in America, has foundered, with the US hitting its 50,000 cap for refugee resettlement this year and officials abruptly leaving their on-island interviews on Nauru two weeks early.

Both the US and Australian governments have said the deal remains on track but details of the agreement are unknown.

No one held under Australia’s offshore regime has been resettled under the US program and the deal does not commit the US to taking a single refugee if it deems they have not passed “extreme vetting”, a threshold that has never been defined.

Australian officials have conceded that, even if the US resettlement program does go ahead, it will not clear the detention centres, leaving “a balance” on the two islands.

The Manus detention centre is being progressively shut down with more than 800 men still housed there. Buildings have been closed off, power shut off, activities stopped and people forcibly moved from their dormitories. There are reports there is no more running water in parts of the camp and those within are reliant on bottled water.

Despite the camp closing around them, many of those in the detention centre are refusing to leave, saying they will not be safe in the community.

The PNG prime minister, Peter O’Neill, said the American deal remained a viable solution to close the camp but said his government was “looking at all options” for the men in the camp.

The Human Rights Law Centre’s Daniel Webb said offshore detention had run “four years too many”.

Farhard, 36, a stateless Kurd, who fled persecution in Iran.
Farhard, 36, a stateless Kurd, who fled persecution in Iran. Photograph: Behrouz Boochani/GetUp/Human Rights Law Centre

In a series of interviews with Webb and with Iranian journalist and Manus detainee Behrouz Boochani, men in detention have said they faced uncertain futures.

I feel like everything the Australian government is doing is designed to force us to go home or go into PNG. They are squeezing us out of the camp but not to the airport where they will take us to safety. They are squeezing us into the PNG community where we are not safe.
– Amir, 23, Iran

The situation here is getting worse and worse. They have shut down classrooms. Closed the gym. They tell us every day that we can’t stay here. They say go back to your country or go to the transit centre. But we aren’t safe out there in the community. That is the worst thing – they are trying to push us somewhere where we will not be safe.
– Madu, 23, stateless Rohingya

We’ve had so many hard times. We’ve been attacked, we’ve been punched and we’ve been fired at with shotguns. My friend, Reza, was killed. He was a gentle man. But they didn’t care who we were.
– Farhard, 36, stateless Kurd

Webb said the US deal initially gave those on those islands some hope that “finally our government was conceding it couldn’t just abandon them there forever”.

“But it’s now eight months since the deal was announced and not a single refugee has been resettled,” he said. “Most of the men on Manus haven’t even had an initial interview.

“The bottom line is that no one is likely to go to the US anytime soon and many now seem unlikely to ever go at all. Two-thousand lives remain on a painful pause with no end in sight. One hundred and sixty-nine childhoods are being spent surrounded by suffering and despair.

“After four years, enough is well and truly enough.”

The foreign affairs minister, Julie Bishop, said on the weekend the US deal was “progressing as we expected”, saying there had not been any delay.

“The United States is upholding the agreement,” she said.

Ian Rintoul from the Refugee Action Coalition said the US deal had stalled and those held on Australia’s offshore islands had been “living on false hopes for eight months already”.

“Now those hopes have been dashed again,” he said. “It is time for the Turnbull government to end the pretence of the US deal and act immediately to bring them all the asylum seekers and refugees to Australia.”

Paul Ronald, the chief executive of Save the Children, the child welfare agency that formerly worked on Nauru, said that, even if the US deal remained a possibility, the current situations on Nauru and Manus were untenable.

“The Australian government is undeniably responsible for the health and welfare of those who it has transferred offshore,” he said. “Refugees on Nauru and Manus Island can no longer remain in limbo. Prime minister Turnbull should immediately bring them to safety in Australia while they await resettlement in the US or until another safe and sustainable alternative can be secured.”

Last month, the Australian government agreed to pay $70m in compensation to the Manus Island detainees, who sought damages in the Victorian supreme court for illegally detaining them in dangerous and harmful conditions.

In agreeing to the record payout, the government did not concede liability.

There is a hastened effort under way to get the payout money to the 1905 men enjoined to the class action before Manus is closed, because it may be difficult to find them after that time.

The Manus and Nauru processing centres were re-opened in 2012 under the Gillard government, but July 13 marks the date of the policy shift - under Rudd - prohibiting any asylum seeker who arrived by boat from ever resettling in Australia.

Vigils will be held across the country to mark four years since the alteration to Australian policy.


Ben Doherty

The GuardianTramp

Related Content

Article image
Asylum seekers face lifetime ban from entering Australia if they arrive by boat
New law to include refugees and will apply to any adult sent to Manus Island or Nauru since July 2013

Gareth Hutchens

30, Oct, 2016 @3:14 AM

Article image
This pains me, but it's time to compromise on Australia's cruel asylum seeker policy | Robert Manne
Vacating the moral high ground is part of ending the most terrible act perpetrated by the Australian state during my lifetime

Robert Manne

22, Sep, 2018 @10:02 PM

Article image
The Nauru files: cache of 2,000 leaked reports reveal scale of abuse of children in Australian offshore detention
Exclusive: The largest cache of documents to be leaked from within Australia’s asylum seeker detention regime details assaults, sexual assaults and self-harm

Paul Farrell, Nick Evershed and Helen Davidson

10, Aug, 2016 @6:59 AM

Article image
Legal challenge to Australia's offshore detention of asylum seekers goes ahead
A high court case over whether constitution permits offshore processing is still on, despite the passing of rushed legislation to head it off this week

Shalailah Medhora

26, Jun, 2015 @11:42 PM

Article image
ACT offers to resettle refugees held in 'inhumane' offshore detention centres
Motion passes without division and declares government willing to settle people from Manus Island and Nauru

Ben Doherty

24, Aug, 2017 @6:46 AM

Article image
Linda Burney admits interview transcript left out call for offshore detention time limit
Peter Dutton says Labor ‘fabricated’ transcript but MP says it was a ‘genuine mistake’ by her staff

Paul Karp

24, May, 2018 @2:06 AM

Article image
Last four refugee children leave Nauru for resettlement in US
Move follows intense campaign by refugee advocates for all children sent to the island by the Australian government to be taken off

Helen Davidson

27, Feb, 2019 @10:46 PM

Article image
Turnbull suggests Australia is not responsible for asylum seekers held offshore
‘Those centres are managed by the respective governments, PNG and Nauru – that’s a fact,’ PM tells Four Corners

Lenore Taylor Political editor

27, Jun, 2016 @8:43 PM

Article image
Australia's offshore detention damages asylum seekers because it's supposed to
Healthcare on Nauru and Manus comes a distant third to deterrence and profit, experts argue, which puts doctors asked to work there in an impossible position

Ben Doherty

18, Jan, 2016 @8:43 PM

Article image
Australia sailed asylum seekers to remote reef to prevent them accessing mainland
By sending asylum seekers to Ashmore Reef, government wanted to ensure boat arrivals could be legally detained offshore

Ben Doherty

23, Jul, 2018 @10:00 PM