Why have mildly erotic nymphs been removed from a Manchester gallery? Is Picasso next?

Hylas and the Nymphs is no masterpiece. But if it has to be removed from a gallery, will the nudes of Titian and Picasso be next? My, what a utopia

Manchester Art Gallery says it has removed JW Waterhouse’s 1896 painting Hylas and the Nymphs from its displays “to prompt conversation”. Yet the conversation can only really be about one thing: should museums censor works of art on political grounds?

There can only be one answer if you believe in human progress.

To remove this work art from view is not an interesting critique but a crass gesture that will end up on the wrong side of history. This censorship belongs in the bin along with Section 28’s war on gay culture and the prosecution of Penguin Books for publishing Lady Chatterley’s Lover in 1960.

My, what a utopia these new puritans have in mind – a world that backtracks 60 years or more into an era of repression and hypocrisy. The great freedoms of modernity include, like it or not, freedom of sexual expression. Even a kinky old Victorian perv has his right to paint soft-porn nymphs.

Hylas and the Nymphs is no masterpiece. Its mildly erotic vision of a Greek myth is very silly, if you ask me, and if we were in front of it now I’d be poking fun. Yet we’d be looking, talking, perhaps arguing. Remove it and the conversation is killed stone dead. Culture falls silent as the grave.

This painting is pretty mild stuff compared with some truly great art that, by the same logic, should immediately be removed from Britain’s galleries. The Rokeby Venus by Velázquez clearly needs to return to the National Gallery stores, where this silken nude can lie on her sensual sheets without causing offence. Titian’s Diana and Actaeon also has to go – its display of female flesh is truly gratuitous. And there is just enough time for Tate Modern to cancel its forthcoming Picasso show, which is guaranteed to contain a jaw-dropping quantity of salivating sexist visions.

Creativity has never been morally pure. Not so long ago, in the 90s, art was deliberately shocking and some were duly shocked to visit galleries and be shown Myra Hindley, unmade beds and toy Nazis. Now the tables have turned, and it’s cool to be appalled by – in this case – art made over a century ago. I can’t pretend to respect such authoritarianism. It is the just the spectre of an oppressive past wearing new clothes – and if we fall for the disguise we sign away every liberal value.

Contributor

Jonathan Jones

The GuardianTramp

Related Content

Article image
Removing nymphs from a gallery is provocative – but does not merit contempt | Gilane Tawadros
In taking down a mediocre, semi-pornographic Victorian painting, Manchester Art Gallery invited public responses to a question that some critics do not want asked, says writer and curator Gilane Tawadros

Gilane Tawadros

02, Feb, 2018 @4:15 PM

Article image
Gallery removes naked nymphs painting to 'prompt conversation'
Manchester Art Gallery takes down work by Waterhouse and asks public to post reactions

Mark Brown arts correspondent

31, Jan, 2018 @5:37 PM

Article image
Jennifer Scott appointed first female director of Dulwich Picture Gallery
Scott leaves the directorship of the Holburne Museum in Bath after just two years to head the historic south London institution

Maev Kennedy

14, Dec, 2016 @5:24 PM

Article image
Our removal of Waterhouse’s naked nymphs painting was art in action | Sonia Boyce
I coordinated an event at Manchester Art Gallery at which Waterhouse’s painting was taken down, says artist Sonia Boyce

Sonia Boyce

06, Feb, 2018 @11:54 AM

Article image
Hylas and the Nymphs and sexual awakening | Letters
Letters: Adrian Rifkin and Mary Pester recount how Waterhouse’s images helped them realise their sexuality; Helen Clutton disputes the charge of paedophilia

Letters

06, Feb, 2018 @6:21 PM

Article image
‘This has never been so much fun!’: Royal Academy Summer Exhibition review
Royal Academy, London
What – where is all the mediocre art? Yinka Shonibare has turned this annual event into a thrilling, thoughtful showcase boasting giant fruit and Colston in chains

Jonathan Jones

16, Sep, 2021 @2:34 PM

Article image
‘Almost as botched as Monkey Christ!’ Has the National Gallery ruined a Nativity masterpiece?
The restoration of this treasure took three years. So why do the shepherds look so gormless? Is the curly-haired one at a school disco – and is the other trying to remember where he parked the donkey?

Jonathan Jones

17, Dec, 2022 @9:00 AM

Article image
Wynford Dewhurst: art of ‘Manchester's Monet’ goes on show
Retrospective exhibition celebrates work of controversial but largely unknown English impressionist painter

Helen Pidd North of England correspondent

07, Dec, 2016 @11:47 AM

Article image
Rarely seen LS Lowry painting expected to sell for up to £3m
Depiction of workers walking to railway station was painted in 1960 and has not been shown in public for a generation

Mark Brown

27, May, 2014 @6:27 PM

Article image
Ian McKellen leads challenge to Tate over LS Lowry 'exclusion'

Actor demands London galleries sell 23 works by Manchester painter rather than continue to store them

Martin Wainwright

17, Apr, 2011 @8:58 PM