Orwell’s Nineteen Eighty-Four was about liberalism, not totalitarianism, claims Moscow diplomat

Maria Zakharova says idea book is about totalitarianism is ‘one of the biggest global fakes’, in claim disputed by Russian translator

George Orwell’s dystopian classic Nineteen Eighty-Four was written to describe the dangers of western liberalism – not totalitarianism - a top Moscow diplomat has claimed.

“For many years we believed that Orwell described the horrors of totalitarianism. This is one of the biggest global fakes … Orwell wrote about the end of liberalism. He depicted how liberalism would lead humanity to a dead end,” Maria Zakharova, the spokesperson for Russia’s foreign ministry, said during a public talk in Ekaterinburg on Saturday.

Published in 1949, the book is seen as a cautionary tale warning of the consequences of totalitarianism and mass surveillance. Orwell is believed to have modelled the totalitarian government depicted in the novel on Nazi Germany and Stalinist Russia.

Zakharova had been asked by a member of the public how to respond to friends and relatives abroad when they suggested that Russia was living in a modern-day replay of Orwell’s novel.

“Orwell did not write about the USSR, it wasn’t about us,” she said. “He wrote about the society in which he lived, about the collapse of the ideas of liberalism. And you were made to believe that Orwell wrote it about you.” Zakharova suggested the audience member tell her relatives abroad: “It’s you in the west who live in a fantasy world where a person can be cancelled.”

Russia’s aggressive state media campaign to justify its invasion of Ukraine has drawn comparisons to Nineteen Eighty-Four and its most celebrated line: “War is peace. Freedom is slavery. Ignorance is strength.”

Sign up to First Edition, our free daily newsletter – every weekday morning at 7am BST

Moscow has mobilised the full force of the state propaganda machine to portray Vladimir Putin’s invasion as a defensive campaign to “liberate” Ukraine, and authorities have introduced strict laws banning the description of the country’s actions in Ukraine as “war” and “an invasion”.

Despite, or perhaps because of, Moscow’s efforts, sales of Nineteen Eighty-Four have risen sharply in Russia recently, with one marketplace saying they had witnessed a 75% increase.

There has also been anecdotal evidence that Russian soldiers fighting in Ukraine have turned to Nineteen Eighty-Four. When one Ukrainian couple returned to their home last month after the Russian retreat from Irpin, a town just outside of Kyiv, they found that a Russian-language copy of Nineteen Eighty-Four had been removed from their shelf and lay open on the sofa, suggesting that the Russian soldiers had been reading it.

Viktor Golyshev, a prominent linguist who translated the novel into Russian, disputed Zakharova’s assertions and said the novel was “not at all” about the decline of liberalism.

“I think it is a novel about a totalitarian state. When he wrote it, totalitarian states were already in decline, but between the first and second world wars, half of Europe had totalitarian governments. At the time there was no decline of liberalism, not at all,” the translator said.

It is not the first time Russian officials have blasted liberalism. In 2019, Putin told the Financial Times that liberalism was “obsolete”.

In 2017, while comparing mainstream western media to “Big Brother”, the leader of the totalitarian state in Orwell’s novel, Zakharova mistakenly called the book 1982.

Across the border in Belarus, itself subjected to a crackdown on civil society and freedom of speech, authorities last week banned Nineteen Eighty-Four and local publishers were instructed to withdraw it from their shelves.


Pjotr Sauer

The GuardianTramp

Related Content

Article image
Feminist retelling of Nineteen Eighty-Four approved by Orwell’s estate
American writer Sandra Newman’s novel Julia will tell the dystopian story from the perspective of Winston Smith’s lover

Alison Flood

07, Dec, 2021 @9:00 AM

Article image
Egyptian student arrested carrying copy of Nineteen Eighty-Four
Police accuse Cairo student of filming security forces without permission and say they are unaware of book’s significance

Patrick Kingsley in Cairo

10, Nov, 2014 @12:32 PM

Orwell's Nineteen Eighty-Four

Though all "thinking people", as they are still sometimes called, must by now have more than a vague idea of the dangers which mankind runs from modern techniques, George Orwell, like Aldous Huxley, feels that the more precise we are in our apprehensions the better

09, Jun, 2008 @11:01 PM

The digested classic: 14 June

The digested classic: 'The clocks were striking 13 as Winston Smith entered his seventh-floor flat in Victory Mansions'

John Crace

13, Jun, 2008 @11:10 PM

Article image
Summer readings: Nineteen Eighty-Four by George Orwell

Saptarshi Ray: The parallels between Orwell's masterpiece and my ancestral home of Kolkata were myriad for me one hot summer holiday

Saptarshi Ray

06, Aug, 2011 @8:00 AM

Article image
Orwell's Nineteen Eighty-Four forecast for Hollywood remake
An American consortium that includes director Ron Howard has secured the film rights to George Orwell's highly influential novel

Ben Child

22, Mar, 2012 @11:35 AM

Article image
Test your knowledge of Nineteen Eighty-Four - quiz

On the 66th anniversary of its publication, how much do you know about George Orwell's classic dystopia?

08, Jun, 2015 @1:57 PM

Article image
US cinemas to show Nineteen Eighty-Four in anti-Trump protest
Coordinated screenings across North America set for 4 April to highlight Orwell’s portrait of a government ‘that manufactures facts’

Andrew Pulver

21, Feb, 2017 @3:39 PM

Article image
November’s Reading group: Nineteen Eighty-four by George Orwell
Sam Jordison: Orwell’s modern classic about totalitarianism is a perfect choice to mark the anniversary of the fall of the Berlin Wall – and to kick off the discussion we’ve got 10 copies to give away

Sam Jordison

04, Nov, 2014 @12:02 PM

Article image
Nineteen Eighty-four: bad good or good bad fiction?
Sam Jordison: You don’t need to be Will Self to find fault with Orwell’s novel. But are its huge faults also essential to its virtues?

Sam Jordison

18, Nov, 2014 @5:19 PM