Home Office admits LGBTQI+ refugees could be persecuted if sent to Rwanda

Report on policy to send gay and lesbian asylum seekers to country raises concerns over possible treatment

The Home Office has admitted that lesbian, gay and bisexual refugees could be persecuted if sent to Rwanda – but still plans to fly them 4,000 miles to Kigali.

The department’s equality impact assessment for the policy states there are “concerns” over the treatment of some LGBTQI+ people in the east African country, and that investigations point to “ill treatment” of this group being “more than one off”.

It comes the day after the Home Office said the first group of people would be informed this week of the government’s intention to relocate them to Rwanda. The first flights were expected to take place in the coming months, it said, adding that lawyers for some of those affected were likely to launch proceedings to stop their removal.

In the report released on Monday, the assessment says “there are concerns over the treatment of some LGBTQI+ people but we will continue to consider the impact on this group and take into account further evidence over the course of the partnership”.

The report notes that homosexuality was decriminalised in 2010, but warns: “At this stage, investigations point to ill treatment being more than one off, but it does not appear to be systemic.”

The government’s assessment of Rwanda’s human rights record, states that there are “not substantial grounds” for believing they would be at risk of treatment contrary to article 3 (freedom from torture and inhuman or degrading treatment) of the European convention of human rights in Rwanda.

At the same time, the Foreign Office travel advice for Rwanda states that “individuals can experience discrimination and abuse, including from local authorities. There are no specific anti-discrimination laws that protect LGBT individuals.”

Lewis Mudge, central Africa director at Human Rights Watch, said the risk assessment was an unrealistic assessment of a country with a poor human rights record.

“The Home Office’s report reads like some serious wishful thinking and they seem to change the facts in order to justify a preordained conclusion. From claiming that refugees are not targeted for exercising their freedom of expression – when Congolese refugees rot in jail for protesting their living conditions – to claiming that LGBT people won’t risk serious harm in Rwanda – when evidence we’ve collected has LGBTI people detained, beaten, insulted and harassed for their sexual identity.”

“This report is not grounded in reality. The Rwandan government has an abysmal record when it comes to guaranteeing internationally recognised refugee rights, statues and protocols. It’s difficult to imagine a less genuine assessment of Rwanda’s shocking human rights record,” he said.

In another document released on Monday night, the government said it could send notices of intent to those coming to the UK without authorisation that would warn them they could be sent to Rwanda.

A draft letter said: “I am writing to inform you about how your protection claim is being managed. We have evidence that before you claimed asylum in the United Kingdom, you were present in or had a connection to [name the safe country or countries]. This may have consequences for whether your claim is admitted to the UK asylum system.

“We may also ask Rwanda, another country we consider to be safe, whether it would admit you, under the terms of the migration and economic development partnership between Rwanda and the UK.”

Enver Solomon, the chief executive of the Refugee Council, said letters carrying a threat of Rwanda would prompt many of those waiting for their claims to be processed to disappear and hide from the authorities in the UK.

Sign up to First Edition, our free daily newsletter – every weekday morning at 7am BST

“The government is failing in its duty of care to people in the asylum system by not recognising the devastating impact the threat of being expelled to Rwanda is having on them.

“The process it is putting in place lacks compassion and demonstrates an inability to see the face behind the case. It shows how this government simply wants to treat vulnerable people who have fled war and oppression as human cargo to be transported thousands of miles away out of sight and out of mind,” he said.

A Home Office spokesperson said: “There is no evidence to substantiate these baseless claims.

“Illegal migrants, including those who crossed the Channel, may be removed and we have the power to detain people ahead of their removal from the UK.

“Only those with inadmissible asylum claims who have made dangerous, unnecessary and illegal journeys will be relocated and to suggest otherwise is wrong.”


Rajeev Syal and Haroon Siddique

The GuardianTramp

Related Content

Article image
Home Office chief questions whether Rwanda plan will deter asylum seekers
Matthew Rycroft says that without evidence to justify the plan he cannot be sure it provides value for money

Andrew Sparrow Political correspondent

17, Apr, 2022 @12:04 PM

Article image
Home Office staff threaten mutiny over ‘shameful’ Rwanda asylum deal
On an intranet noticeboard civil servants drew a comparison with serving under Adolf Hitler, and asked if they had a duty to ‘resist’

Rajeev Syal and Mark Brown

20, Apr, 2022 @7:05 PM

Article image
Priti Patel: Rwanda plan critics ‘fail to offer their own solutions’
UK home secretary attacks critics of plan to give unauthorised asylum seekers one-way tickets to African country

Haroon Siddique

18, Apr, 2022 @5:15 PM

Article image
Home Office’s Rwanda deportation plans face high court challenge
About 30 asylum seekers expected to be sent to Rwanda on 14 June

Rajeev Syal and Diane Taylor

08, Jun, 2022 @3:33 PM

Article image
Priti Patel’s Rwanda asylum seeker plan faces first legal challenge
Charity Freedom from Torture says it has ‘serious concerns’ about lawfulness of policy

Rajeev Syal Home affairs editor

27, Apr, 2022 @12:02 PM

Article image
Priti Patel could face Home Office mutiny over Rwanda asylum plan
Unions say civil servants could stage mass walkouts after home secretary overruled their concerns

Jenn Selby

16, Apr, 2022 @2:56 PM

Article image
Children deemed adults by Home Office could be deported to Rwanda
Children’s and refugees charities raise concerns after detention of three children misjudged as adults in offshoring programme

Diane Taylor

13, Jun, 2022 @6:00 AM

Article image
Rwanda deportation flight at risk despite loss of two late appeals
Home Office source says individual legal cases mean too few people may be able to board plane anyway

Rajeev Syal and Diane Taylor

13, Jun, 2022 @6:57 PM

Article image
Rwanda asylum plan: who does it target and is it going to happen?
Plans have surprised many, have few precedents and have been condemned as cruel and unworkable

Rajeev Syal Home affairs editor

14, Apr, 2022 @5:16 PM

Article image
First refugees to be told this week of their relocation to Rwanda
Arrivals who crossed Channel will be notified of Home Office plan to send them to nation to make asylum claims

Christy Cooney

09, May, 2022 @7:50 PM