MPs urge asbestos company to pay £10m to fund cancer research

All-party group including peers backs campaign by victims’ group, saying Cape ‘knowingly put people in danger’

MPs and peers have written to one of the biggest manufacturers of asbestos, calling on it to make a £10m donation towards mesothelioma research “for knowingly putting people in danger”.

In a letter to Altrad, parent company of Cape, the all-party parliamentary group (APPG) on occupational safety and health says that documents released after a long-running court battle show that Cape historically “provided misleading reassurance about the dangers of asbestos”.

The MPs and peers also say the documents show that Cape “compromised the government’s regulatory response to asbestos” by selectively sharing sampling data on the carcinogenic material and lobbying for higher permitted dust limits and watered down product warnings.

After the release of the documents, which Cape resisted, taking the case to the supreme court, the Asbestos Victims Support Groups (AVSG) Forum UK has been campaigning for the company to make a £10m donation towards mesothelioma research.

In a letter to Altrad’s chief executive, Ran Oren, the APPG urges him to meet the demand, pointing out that, in 1969, Cape’s group medical advised that the fatal cancer could be caused by “short and possibly small” exposure and that “no type of asbestos proved innocent”.

The Labour MP Ian Lavery, the APPG chair, and the group’s other members, say: “Knowing the links between the products made by your company, the role of Cape in knowingly putting more people in danger, and the devastating consequences, we appeal to your company to make this donation. Mesothelioma is always terminal, and Britain has the highest rates of anywhere in the world.

“Your company has played a major role in exposing people to the toxic substance, meanwhile profiting at their expense. Your contribution to medical research may go some way to recompense victims of asbestos disease.”

The letter says that, according to reports published last year, Cape Intermediate Holdings Limited had net assets of £151.5m in 2021, and Altrad made a net profit of €169m (£148m), therefore the companies “have substantial resources to pay the £10m”.

The letter follows one sent by the TUC to Altrad also urging it to make the £10m donation. It cited the statistic that 80% of schools that responded to a government survey said their buildings contain asbestos so, the TUC said, children are also affected.

A Cape spokesperson said: “Cape understands the unfortunate legacy which asbestos has on people’s health. It will be reaching out to the AVSG to establish how it and other stakeholders can support victims of asbestos-related illness beyond the support already provided through its victim compensation fund – the scheme of arrangement.”

The spokesperson said the company had already paid in excess of £48m to individuals and families affected by its past activities under the scheme, adding: “It is important to highlight that the materials referred to extend to certain extracts from thousands of documents dating around 60-70 years ago.

“The current management have not reviewed these documents and cannot comment on the accuracy of the allegations either individually or within the context of facts and circumstances from the 1950s and early 1960s.”

Contributor

Haroon Siddique Legal affairs correspondent

The GuardianTramp

Related Content

Article image
Tessa Jowell calls for global cooperation to help cancer patients
Labour peer given standing ovation for moving speech in House of Lords about her brain cancer

Patrick Greenfield

25, Jan, 2018 @6:34 PM

Article image
Manchester cancer hospital fire 'may have destroyed vital research'
Cancer Research UK institute likely to have lost millions of pounds of life-saving equipment in blaze, says its director

Josh Halliday North of England correspondent

28, Apr, 2017 @11:34 AM

Article image
Cancer charities say coronavirus shortfall will set back research
Cancer Research UK and Macmillan to lose hundreds of millions in funding as voluntary sector reels from crisis

Patrick Butler and Steven Morris

07, Apr, 2020 @6:48 PM

Article image
MRI twice as likely as biopsy to spot prostate cancer, research shows
Finding could bring about change of practice in NHS with ‘potential to save many lives’, says charity

Sarah Boseley Health editor

19, Jan, 2017 @11:30 PM

Article image
Cancer Drugs Fund condemned as expensive and ineffective
Treatments approved by David Cameron’s scheme were not worth money, extended life very little and often had adverse side-effects, study finds

Sarah Boseley Health editor

28, Apr, 2017 @5:30 AM

Article image
UK unions call in cancer expert over fears of asbestos risk to female teachers
Concerns at mesothelioma death rate trigger study to detect exposure to now banned material used in school buildings

Michael Savage Policy Editor

15, Jan, 2023 @10:00 AM

Article image
Cancer patients could be disadvantaged by Brexit, say experts
Collaboration with Europe is crucial to future breakthroughs, say cancer experts including Nobel prize winner Sir Paul Nurse

Nadia Khomami

24, Feb, 2017 @2:56 PM

Article image
UK asbestos maker withheld information on material’s risks, court papers show
According to documents, Cape played down dangers and lobbied for warning labels to be tempered

Haroon Siddique Legal affairs correspondent

20, Mar, 2022 @4:13 PM

Article image
Cancer vaccine trials could start in England by autumn
Government deal with BioNTech paves way for early access to trials of personalised mRNA therapies

Jamie Grierson

06, Jan, 2023 @9:09 AM

Article image
Prostate cancer laser treatment could be a gamechanger for men
A drug that can kill cancerous cells without the side-effects of radical surgery is causing massive excitement for good reason

Sarah Boseley

20, Dec, 2016 @4:58 PM