Let’s reverse the mad experiment of Brexit | Letters

Readers on the anti-Brexit mood in the country, the folly of looking to a Swiss-style deal and the need for rational dialogue

Rishi Sunak may have to placate his party (Sunak tries to pacify Brexiters but keeps door open to closer EU ties, 21 November), but we the people don’t. We were never asked to vote on a hard Brexit; the consequences were just not explained. Did the Brexiters consider the labour shortages and economic consequences, or the effects on Northern Ireland? It seems unlikely. Even now, when we are suffering from the financial catastrophe caused by Brexit and the financially illiterate extreme-right ideologues, we have not been told exactly what the “great opportunities” of Brexit are and when they will materialise.

What the country needs is a rational dialogue on which measures would work best – a Swiss-style or bespoke agreement – and consideration of the suggestion by the CBI chief, Tony Danker, to relax immigration rules for much-needed labour and skills.
Marisol de Lafuente Duff
London

• In the middle of the last century, some writers on religion included the communism of the Soviet Union and its vassal states when referring to quasi-religious cults. Simon Jenkins rightly applies the phrase to Brexiter fanatics (We may not be heading for a Swiss-style Brexit deal, but Sunak must face reality, 21 November). Such cults have often teetered on the edge of magic, and the belief in Brexit dividends does indeed come close to believing in fairies. As long as this cult is represented in the House of Commons and its members receive the Conservative whip, it is inevitable that our rulers will fiddle with Tory party management while the country burns.
Geoff Reid
Bradford

• Simon Jenkins avers that “politicians of all parties clap their hands over their ears and scream, ‘Brexit is over. Forget it’.” Wrong. The SNP doesn’t, and it is the third largest party in the UK parliament.
Helen Swann
Glasgow

• Could we stop talking about a Swiss-style solution please? The Swiss are far from resolving their relationship with the EU. The protracted framework negotiations to replace the hundreds of separate agreements previously in place broke down last year.

Since then, Switzerland has been downgraded to a “non-associated third country” in the EU’s Horizon Europe framework programme for research, resulting in it losing its influence. The country has lost many other access privileges too. There is no easy solution to be found here.
Beatrice Türler
Wilmslow, Cheshire

• Zoe Williams’ piece on the anti-Brexit mood taking hold in the country was nicely optimistic (Most Britons now think Brexit was a bad idea – the government just hasn’t caught up yet, 21 November). But still the petition to parliament to rejoin the EU is only at a miserable 14,167 as I write this. Where are these people who want rejoin the EU? My guess is that they’re simply not aware that there’s a petition. Could the Guardian highlight this with a campaign perhaps?

Where are the thousands who marched in October? Where are the Liberal Democrats? They must have more than 14,167 members alone. Where are the young, the city dwellers, anybody and everybody who wants us to finish this mad Brexit experiment? This petition should be in the millions, shouldn’t it? C’mon, let’s do this thing, let’s reverse it.
Nye Gibbons
St-Martial-sur-Né, France

Have an opinion on anything you’ve read in the Guardian today? Please email us your letter and it will be considered for publication.

The GuardianTramp

Related Content

Article image
Let’s have the full Brexit for political and economic renewal | Letters
Letters: Chris Bickerton et al urge a clean break from the EU, Eric Goodyer says Labour MPs should support both Keir Starmer’s proposal and the Lords amendment to rejoin the EEA, Chris Farrands offers association as a way for the Tories to clarify their position, and John Airs says it is dangerous for Labour to alienate leave voters

Letters

11, Jun, 2018 @5:02 PM

Article image
No-deal Brexit threatens overseas territories | Letter
Letter: It is a bitter irony that Tory Brexiters who claim to be the strongest defenders of the UK overseas territories are precipitating a crisis that threatens their economic security, writes Peter Clegg

Letters

05, Sep, 2019 @5:35 PM

Article image
The Guardian view on Brexit trade talks: folly and distraction | Editorial
Editorial: The insistence by the government that the transition period will end on 31 December, come what may, is a triumph of ideology over good sense

Editorial

20, Apr, 2020 @5:59 PM

Article image
The Guardian view on Brexit talks: not too late for realism | Editorial
Editorial: Boris Johnson has needlessly wasted time and goodwill, but a calculation of his own self-interest still points towards a deal

Editorial

14, Oct, 2020 @5:30 PM

Article image
Tumbling towards a no-deal Brexit catastrophe | Letters
Letters: The electorate should be invited to reconsider, says Bernard Stafford. I voted Brexit but we now know so much more, says Bill Butterworth. Plus letters from Dr Richard Turner, Chris Webster, Angela Neustatter and Mick Crawley

Letters

14, Aug, 2019 @4:02 PM

Article image
The Guardian view on the Brexit endgame: drop the clean break myth | Editorial
Editorial: The prime minister needs to look beyond 31 December and start repairing relations with Britain’s neighbours

Editorial

27, Nov, 2020 @6:30 PM

Article image
Brexit: the Irish question and the English puzzle | Letters
Letters: Readers respond to a Guardian article by Fintan O’Toole

Letters

21, Nov, 2018 @5:41 PM

Article image
Mass testing for Covid-19 and a messy Brexit | Letters
Letters: Dr Simon Warne says Boris Johnson’s Liverpool experiment needs to be evaluated properly, while Stephen Bates is wondering what will happen when the crises of Covid and Brexit coincide

Letters

30, Nov, 2020 @5:10 PM

Article image
The impact of Brexit is not a trivial matter | Letters
Letters: Readers raise concerns over Labour’s position on a second referendum, the plight of UK citizens in the rest of the EU, the antics of Leave.EU and comparisons of a no-deal Brexit with the millennium bug

Letters

27, Aug, 2018 @4:29 PM

Article image
The Guardian view on Swiss-style Brexit speculation: a recognition of failure | Editorial
Editorial: Controversial briefings to the press by senior government figures reflect a change in the zeitgeist

Editorial

21, Nov, 2022 @6:47 PM