Labour must take aim at Boris Johnson’s Brexit disaster | Letters

Readers on the consequences of leaving the EU, and the need for opposition parties to hold the government to account for its broken promises

John Harris’s excellent article (The gap between reckless Brexit promises and reality will soon be too big to ignore, 18 October) was extremely sobering. “What happens,” he asks, “when some watershed is reached, and the fact that people were conned becomes inescapable?”, linking the way public trust was undermined by the Iraq war and by Brexit. Both before war was declared on Iraq, and also before Brexit was enacted, some 1 million people marched through the streets of London in opposition. These people were engaged, informed, enlightened folk from across the country, committed enough to march for policies that to them represented the right way forward, for Britain and the world. The governments of the day ignored them.

The consequences of the Iraq war and Brexit are now all too clear. We should not have made war; we should not have left Europe. As John Harris says: “People in the political mainstream – by which I chiefly mean Labour MPs – need to start loudly talking about Brexit … and what life outside Europe is doing to us.” Absolutely. I feel sure there are millions of voters desperate for Keir Starmer, the shadow cabinet and all Labour MPs, at every opportunity, to do exactly that.
David Curtis
Solihull, West Midlands

• John Harris lets the Westminster opposition parties off the hook. Labour failed to offer a clear message in the referendum campaign and must take some responsibility for the result. Talking about the effects of Brexit at the moment highlights yet another internal division. And the Liberal Democrats seem reluctant to tell voters they were conned. Surely, it is no great problem to say loud and clear that the Tories misled the country over leaving the EU, and thus we are on course for incremental disaster.
Geoff Reid

• Polly Toynbee (The Tories are sacrificing Northern Irish businesses on the altar of Brexit purity, 18 October) makes a very welcome plea: “It’s time for Labour to shake off old remoaner phobias and turn its full firepower on every aspect of Johnson’s Brexit disaster.” May I suggest that the imminent spending review and autumn budget would present the ideal opportunity to do so. Clearly, the damage being done by Brexit to tax revenues is a very significant factor in spending and budget considerations.

Whereas many of the serious Brexit problems, such as HGV driver and social care staff shortages, are self-evident, the insidious aspect of Brexit is the reduction to GDP and the corresponding loss of tax revenue, unfortunately clouded by the economic impact of Covid. The losses to date of financial services alone would suggest the Office of Budget Responsibility’s 2020 forecast of a Brexit reduction to GDP of 5% over 15 years is probably of the right order. In the light of actual Brexit experience to date, Labour should demand that the OBR forecast be updated.
David Newens
Great Linford, Milton Keynes

• On a recent trip to France, my newfound freedom meant that I was no longer able to slip from one country to another, but that I was treated as a foreigner on entering France, my passport being stamped and my visit limited. I crept in ashamed to be British, leaving behind a country with empty supermarket shelves, no fuel at the pumps and high Covid levels with shambolic pandemic advice.
Ben Hoare
Gilesgate, County Durham

Have an opinion on anything you’ve read in the Guardian today? Please email us your letter and it will be considered for publication.


The GuardianTramp

Related Content

Article image
Labour’s remain struggle and Boris Johnson’s PM strategy | Letters
Letters: Paul Atkin, Bryn Jones and Marie Catterson respond to an article by Owen Jones, while Janet Jones hopes the Queen will step in to defend the rights of her subjects


30, Jun, 2019 @5:07 PM

Article image
Should Labour oppose Brexit? | Letters
Letters: John Cookson says there is no political downside to Labour opposing Brexit, while Peter Rowlands thinks Labour can win on the basis of a soft Brexit


29, May, 2018 @5:23 PM

Article image
Brexit, ‘spineless’ Labour and a grannies’ revolt | Letters
Letters: John Marzeillier, David Goudge and Ted Pawley respond to Caroline Flint’s Guardian article where she said she must honour her constituents’ decision to leave the EU. Plus letters from Tommy Gee, Roger Woodhouse, Julian Le Vay, Trevor Dean, Alice Appleton, Alison Harris, and Pauline Shelley


07, Feb, 2019 @6:19 PM

Article image
Labour needs to shine a light on Tory failures | Letters
Letters: Readers respond to a piece by Andy Beckett, where he argues that the Conservative party is avoiding blame for the dire state of Britain today


02, Dec, 2019 @6:37 PM

Article image
Labour MPs must vote against Boris Johnson’s Brexit deal | Letters
Letters: Labour parliamentarians should act in the interest of their constituents, not for short-term gain, argue Rob Sykes and Martin Pask. Plus readers respond to the prime minister’s three letters ploy


20, Oct, 2019 @5:30 PM

Article image
The Labour party’s Brexit stance is the grownup thing to do | Letters
Letters: Unite general secretary Len McCluskey, Judith Daniels and Jon Griffith support Jeremy Corbyn’s approach, while other readers disagree – including Nick Wakeling, his Lib Dem opponent in Islington North


18, Sep, 2019 @5:13 PM

Article image
What to make of the Lib Dems’ record? | Letters
Letters: Readers share their views on the Liberal Democrats in the week that Jo Swinson was elected as their new leader


25, Jul, 2019 @4:55 PM

Article image
Unconventional wisdom on Labour ‘heartlands’ | Letters
Letters: Ian Wrigglesworth discusses the awkward fact that there is a substantial Tory vote in the north, Roger Backhouse advocates Old Lefties for Labour to win back the pensioner vote, Robert Leach says Labour should take a tip from the late former MP Jack Dunnett, and Dr Alyson Hall Yandoli proposes a new way of testing the leadership hopefuls


13, Jan, 2020 @5:42 PM

Article image
Labour, Corbyn and national unity | Letters
Letters: Gerald Dunning says Labour’s overriding aim should be to ensure there will never be another Tory government, David Thacker thinks John McDonnell is right to reject a government of national unity, while Roy Boffy criticises Corbyn. Plus letters from Virginia Yates and Ruth Knox


09, Aug, 2019 @4:41 PM

Article image
Delving deeper into the Brexit arithmetic | Letters
Letters: Readers dissect the mathematics behind Monday’s indicative votes and respond to articles by Polly Toynbee and Dawn Foster


02, Apr, 2019 @5:39 PM