Historic Colorado River deal not enough to stave off long-term crisis, experts say

Agreement between California, Arizona and Nevada will cut water consumption by 13% but experts warn river is still in serious peril

A hard-fought agreement between California, Arizona and Nevada to slash the states’ use of the shrinking Colorado River is only a temporary salve to a long-term water crisis that continues to threaten the foundations of life in the American west, experts have warned.

The deal, announced on Monday, between the three states that make up the lower portion of the sprawling Colorado basin will pare back 13% of water consumption from the beleaguered river over the next three years if adopted, averting the prospect of more stringent cuts imposed by the federal government. Backed by $1.2bn in federal funds, the bulk of the reductions are structured to encourage voluntary cuts taken by rights holders, in exchange for grant money.

Now under federal environmental review, the agreement is being hailed as a breakthrough after months of stalled negotiations and missed deadlines. But the emergency intervention will not itself be enough to head off the existential crisis faced by the Colorado River, a result of decades of over-allocation to slake the thirst of a rapidly expanding US west, and it is now caught firmly in the teeth of global heating.

The flow of the river has declined by about 20% since the turn of the century, a period defined by a “megadrought” that is the most severe the west has seen in 1,200 years. The future of a river that supports 40 million people, underpinning the existence of cities from Los Angeles to Denver, and millions of acres of cropland remains precarious.

“This deal is clearly a Band-Aid solution for a short-term fix,” said Katharine Jacobs, an expert in water and climate adaptation at the University of Arizona.

“It’s better than nothing, but we are just putting off a much more dramatic change needed to resolve this problem. The problem we’re trying to solve is just far greater than this. We have a significant shortfall between the river’s supply and demand.”

Jacobs said it is “almost unfortunate” that the US west was deluged by a glut of snow and rainfall over the winter that eased some of the pressure on parched farmland and puddle-like reservoirs, taking some of the onus off negotiators from the seven states – which also include Wyoming, Colorado, New Mexico and Utah – that rely upon the river to agree on more ambitious cuts to confront its long-term decline.

The cuts looked like they would be much tougher last summer, when the federal government said one-third of the river’s annual average flow needed to be saved or it would step in to impose reductions itself.

The warning came as Lake Mead, the US’s largest reservoir, which collects water behind the hulking art deco edifice of the Hoover dam, slumped to a record low level of 1,040ft, revealing dead bodies and sunken boats in its now-desiccated underbelly.

If the lake drops much further, it will not be able to generate the hydroelectric power that millions of people rely on. At an even lower point – 895ft – no water would be able to pass through the dam at all, a disastrous situation called “dead pool” which would essentially cut the water flow to California, Arizona and Nevada.

Scientists have warned that the flow of the river will come under increasing strain due to warming temperatures caused by the burning of fossil fuels, with more water evaporating in the heat and a shrinking of the Rocky Mountain snowpack that nourishes the river at its origins.

The whole basin, which stretches from Wyoming to northern Mexico, is going through a process of “aridification”, in which a hotter, drier state prevails, rather than simply a drought, researchers have warned.

Even without the climate crisis, the Colorado River would probably be stressed. Its allocation is based upon a compact struck in 1922, an unusually wet year, which guaranteed highly optimistic levels of water to states based on a system of seniority (California has always been at the head of the queue).

The apportionment of 17.5m acre-feet of water (an acre-foot is the amount of water that would cover an acre, about the size of a football field, in foot-deep water) a year hasn’t been met, on average, at all over the past century, and during the last two decades of severe drought the shortfall has been stark – less than 10m acre-feet, on average, has flowed through the river each year.

The lower-basin proposal shaves 3m acre-feet off the states’ consumption but the mismatch in supply and demand remains glaring. “This deal does not address the long-term water sustainability challenges in the region,” Dave White, who specialises in water sustainability at Arizona State University, said.

The seven states and the federal government now face the unenviable task of forging a longer-term deal, to last beyond 2026, to bring some sort of stability to the system. Deeper questions may have to be asked about profitable but thirsty crops – like alfalfa – grown in the desert, or the booming levels of housing development happening in water-stressed states like Arizona.

Tempering the growth of the US west in an increasingly punishing climate will probably require fraught compromises, a slew of lawsuits and buckets of compensation – the latest deal will funnel more than $1bn to states, water districts and tribes to offset their lost water. Upper-basin states’ desire to develop their water resource like lower-basin states will somehow have to be managed on a rapidly dwindling resource.

Farmers may be required to fallow land, or shift to different forms of irrigation or even switch crops, but this will require time and money, according to Sharon Megdal, a water policy expert at the University of Arizona.

“Our system requires compensation for taking of property or property rights. You can’t just start with a blank piece of paper and redesign the system – we have to be mindful of that,” she said.

“We need to get to an equilibrium where we use the amount of water nature is providing us. Three million acre-feet probably isn’t enough of a cut but we just can’t let the system crash. This deal at least buys us some time.”

Gabrielle Canon contributed reporting

Contributor

Oliver Milman

The GuardianTramp

Related Content

Article image
US considers imposing Colorado River water cuts to western states
Depending on the plan, either California would be the most affected, or Arizona and Nevada would be parched

Guardian staff and agencies

11, Apr, 2023 @11:20 PM

Article image
Disappearing Lake Powell underlines drought crisis facing Colorado river
As water levels plummet to 45% in America’s second-largest reservoir, new islands appear – and fears grow for a waterway that serves 40 million people

Chris McGreal at Lake Powell

17, May, 2015 @2:11 PM

Article image
US states agree breakthrough deal to prevent Colorado River from drying up
‘Huge lift’ as California, Arizona and Nevada agree with US government to take about 13% less water from drought-stricken river

Oliver Milman in New York and Gabrielle Canon in San Francisco

22, May, 2023 @3:15 PM

Article image
Colorado River snaking through Grand Canyon most endangered US waterway – report
Unique ecosystem on the brink of collapse due to climate crisis and mismanagement, says conservation group American Rivers

Nina Lakhani

18, Apr, 2023 @4:01 AM

Article image
States file duelling Colorado River plans as water resources rapidly dwindle
California files competing proposal on cutting water use of the river as hopes of western states reaching consensus fade

Gabrielle Canon and agencies

01, Feb, 2023 @9:41 PM

Article image
Colorado River has lost 10tn gallons of water since 2000 due to climate crisis
Volume of water lost equal to Lake Mead, US’s largest reservoir, or enough water to fill around 15bn Olympic-sized pools, study finds

Oliver Milman

27, Jul, 2023 @10:00 AM

Article image
US issues western water cuts as drought leaves Colorado River near ‘tipping point’
Arizona, Nevada and Mexico affected as federal government steps in after states failed to reach agreement

Gabrielle Canon, Richard Luscombe and agencies

17, Aug, 2022 @12:59 AM

Article image
The farmers dealing with water shortages even before historic Colorado River deal
In Arizona’s Pinal county water cuts have become a reality even before this month’s historic deal by states to use 13% less water from stricken river

Nina Lakhani in Pinal county, Arizona

31, May, 2023 @10:00 AM

Article image
New Mexico to sue EPA after massive mining spill filled rivers with toxic waste
State officials argue the EPA is responsible for a Colorado mining spill in August 2015 that deposited 3m gallons of toxins into riverbeds and lands in four states

Sam Levin in San Francisco

14, Jan, 2016 @8:14 PM

Article image
Supreme court rules against Navajo nation in Colorado River water dispute
Native American tribe argued federal government had not fulfilled obligations in battle over dwindling water supplies

Guardian staff and agency

22, Jun, 2023 @3:46 PM