Great Barrier Reef flagged as ‘in danger’ world heritage site. What does this mean?

Scientists have delivered clear advice for the reef. So what did their report say, how might the government respond and what happens next?

The status of the Great Barrier Reef as a globally significant and intact world heritage site is under the spotlight again.

Two UN-backed scientists have today recommended, after a 10-day inspection earlier this year, the world’s biggest coral reef system should be placed on a list of world heritage sites “in danger”.

So what did their report say, how might the government respond and what happens next?

What’s in the report?

The 100-page report recounts the investigations of two scientific experts – Eleanor Carter, of the International Union for Conservation of Nature, and Hans Thulstrup of Unesco – from their 10-day trip to Queensland and the reef in March.

The visit coincided with the seventh recorded mass bleaching event on the reef caused by global heating and the first in a La Niña year – a period that, in the past, has given a respite for corals from heating.

For years, Unesco and the World heritage committee which it advises have held concerns about the impacts of climate change on the reef, as well as nutrients and sediments running off cane and banana farms and cattle grazing properties.

The report says while there had been much hard work and progress on improving water quality, the improvements had been far too slow.

The government’s climate policy needed to show a clear path that would put Australia’s efforts in line with keeping global heating to 1.5C. While the Albanese government has improved Australia’s target, experts say it is not in line with 1.5C.

In 10 “high level recommendations” the scientists look at more improvements to programs targeting farmers and graziers, more work on land erosion, clearer and more ambitious climate targets, and state government work to more sustainably manage fisheries and remove gillnets from the marine park.

There are a further 12 lower-priority recommendations.

But the report concluded “the [Great Barrier Reef] is faced with major threats that could have deleterious effects on its inherent characteristics” and that it met the criteria for inscription on the list of world heritage sites in danger.

Rapid implementation of the recommendations, the report said, could “drastically improve” the state and federal government’s chances of conserving the reef and its globally unique features “for future generations”.

What will the government do?

In June 2021, Unesco – the UN’s science and culture agency – sent a recommendation to the world heritage committee that the reef should be placed on the list of sites “in danger”.

The Morrison government said it had been blindsided by the recommendation – a claim rejected by Unesco, which said it had given no assurances to Australia.

This sparked a furious round of international lobbying from the Morrison government, with then environment minister Sussan Ley flying out on a government jet to meet members of the 21-country world heritage committee.

At the same time, Canberra-based diplomats were taken on a snorkelling trip by then reef envoy Warren Entsch, whose seat of Leichhardt is based in Cairns.

Plibersek told reporters on Tuesday that she would be lobbying Unesco on the issue.

In June, she met with Unesco’s director general Audrey Azoulay at an oceans conference in Portugal and the Guardian understands the issue of an “in danger” listing was discussed then.

Great to meet @AAzoulay and discuss Australia’s renewed partnership with @UNESCO and the @IocUnesco. pic.twitter.com/7eZb2ZXFT0

— Tanya Plibersek (@tanya_plibersek) July 1, 2022

Richard Leck, head of oceans at WWF-Australia, encouraged the government “to have greater communication with Unesco.

“But we expect that would involve how the Australian government is adopting these important recommendations and their progress on implementation. Let’s engage on the substance of protecting the reef, not the politics of its protection.”

What happens now?

The world heritage committee is a sovereign decision-making body made up of 21 countries that checks on how governments – known as state parties – are conserving listed sites and considers applications for new inscriptions.

In recent years, observers have expressed deep concerns the committee has become too politicised and was too often ignoring scientific advice, putting the integrity of the convention that governs the process at risk.

Scuba diver examines some dull-looking coral underwater
‘We’ve seen some refreshing language from the Australian government about wanting to shift from being a laggard on climate action and nature protection to being a leader,’ Richard Leck of WWF-Australia says. Photograph: Sam McNeil/AP

When Unesco recommended in 2021 the reef be placed on the “in danger” list, the Guardian reported Australia had engaged in horse-trading with other countries to support them, in return for voting in the government’s favour on the reef.

The recommendation in the latest mission report is not formal advice to the committee, but Unesco will consider it in the coming months as it is expected to compile a State of Conservation report on the reef.

Those conservation reports include “draft decisions” for the world heritage committee to consider and are usually made public at least six weeks before its annual meetings.

When is the next world heritage meeting?

The reef’s status was due to be debated at a world heritage meeting in Russia in July last year, but that meeting was postponed after Russia invaded Ukraine.

Last week Russia resigned as chair of the committee, with rules saying the option to replace them should go to the vice-chair that follows in alphabetical order after Russia.

Saudi Arabia – a country that sided with Australia on reef issues under the Morrison government – is considering taking on the role. If they decline, the option then goes to South Africa, and then Thailand, Argentina and finally Italy.

The next world heritage meeting is expected in the first half of next year and it is possible the reef’s status could be discussed then.

But WWF-Australia – a conservation group that advocates for the reef within the World Heritage process – said on Tuesday that Unesco and the world heritage committee should put any formal consideration of an “in danger” listing on hold until 2024 to give the federal and state governments time.

Leck said: “We’ve seen some refreshing language from the Australian government about wanting to shift from being a laggard on climate action and nature protection to being a leader.

“This report is a real test of that. We need some time for the Australian government to adopt all the recommendations in this report and begin implementation.

“We think it’s appropriate the government be given that time and then an assessment can be done in 2024 on its progress in implementation. If they fail [to implement the recommendations] that’s when an ‘in danger’ listing is considered.”

Contributor

Graham Readfearn

The GuardianTramp

Related Content

Article image
‘A beautiful milestone’: coral grown in Great Barrier Reef nursery spawns for first time
Researchers hope corals grown from fragments that had survived bleaching will tolerate future marine heatwaves

Donna Lu

15, Nov, 2022 @2:00 PM

Article image
Record heat over Great Barrier Reef raises fears of second summer of coral bleaching
‘This does not bode well,’ reef scientist says, as highest November temperatures reached since 1985

Graham Readfearn

25, Nov, 2022 @6:07 AM

Article image
Great Barrier Reef world heritage values damaged by climate change, government admits
Report to Unesco by the federal and Queensland governments says key features have deteriorated since reef was listed in 1981

Graham Readfearn

02, Dec, 2019 @5:12 AM

Article image
The Great Barrier Reef: a catastrophe laid bare
Australia’s natural wonder is in mortal danger. Bleaching caused by climate change has killed almost a quarter of its coral this year and many scientists believe it could be too late for the rest. Using exclusive photographs and new data, a Guardian special report investigates how the reef has been devastated – and what can be done to save it

Michael Slezak

06, Jun, 2016 @11:54 PM

Article image
Great Barrier Reef: advisers call for cap on farm pollution
Taskforce head reportedly tells Queensland government ‘we’re stuffed with a capital S’ if water quality isn’t improved

Michael Slezak

25, May, 2016 @4:39 AM

Article image
Budget earmarks $500m to mitigate Great Barrier Reef climate change
The money will help try to save the reef from crown-of-thorns starfish and reduce pollution, Malcolm Turnbull to announce

Katharine Murphy Political editor

28, Apr, 2018 @8:25 PM

Article image
Great Barrier Reef tourism: caught between commerce and conservation alarm
More people than ever are coming to see the reef and those who make a living showing it off want the world to know it’s still a natural wonder. But they worry about its future, and that of their 64,000-strong industry

Joshua Robertson

16, Apr, 2017 @8:14 PM

Article image
Great Barrier Reef needs $10bn for chance of survival, scientists say
This election is Australia’s last chance to save the reef, which requires $1bn a year for 10 years to reduce water pollution to give it a chance to survive climate change, report warns

Michael Slezak

19, May, 2016 @1:25 AM

Article image
Coral cover around popular Great Barrier Reef islands has almost halved
Scientists shocked by data showing loss of hard corals at 100 locations across Whitsundays, Magnetic Island, Keppel Islands and Palm Islands

Graham Readfearn

24, Oct, 2019 @5:00 PM

Article image
Great Barrier Reef: 30% of coral died in 'catastrophic' 2016 heatwave
Report chronicles ‘mass mortality’, the extent and severity of which has shocked scientists

Ben Smee

18, Apr, 2018 @6:00 PM