‘Tangled mess of inaction’: hundreds of threatened species recovery plans expiring in next six months

Growing list facing extinction and underresourcing of conservation means plans have not been updated

Hundreds of plans for the recovery of threatened species will reach their use-by date in the next six months as the government considers how to reform Australia’s flawed system of environmental protections.

Documents released to Guardian Australia under freedom of information laws detail how underresourcing, disagreement with state governments, and the growing list of species threatened with extinction have constrained the federal environment department’s ability to get on top of a backlog of conservation work.

Environment groups said the material showed a “tangled mess of inaction” over the past decade and failure by past governments to update recovery plans every five years as required under national laws.

The environment department confirmed 372 recovery plans covering 575 species and ecosystems will sunset by the end of 2023 – 355 of those by the end of April.

They include plans for the northern and southern corroboree frogs and critically endangered birds such as the King Island scrubtit.

The 372 plans represent about 89% of all active recovery plans, which are legal documents that guide the management of threatened species and ministers must not make decisions that are inconsistent with them.

The attorney general, Mark Dreyfus, has the power to defer the sunset date of the legal instruments that give effect to the plans and, after a request from the environment and water minister, Tanya Plibersek, has done so for 15 that had been due to lapse in October.

Plibersek will soon deliver her response to the 2020 review of national environmental laws by the former competition watchdog head Graeme Samuel.

Changes to the management of threatened species recovery are expected to form a key part of that, with Plibersek saying past approaches were “not fit for the times”.

Samantha Vine, the head of conservation and science at BirdLife Australia, said the documents released to Guardian Australia “reveal a systemic failure over many years to review and revise recovery plans every five years as required by the act”.

“The result is that hundreds of recovery plans will reach their legislative use-by date within the next 12 months,” she said.

“These documents show that Australia’s extinction crisis has unfortunately been matched by a crisis in how the government has gone about implementing its legal obligation to act once a threatened species is listed.”


When the Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act came into force in 2000, all listed species and habitats required a recovery plan.

Since 2006, whether or not a recovery plan is required has been a decision left up to the environment minister.

Many plants and animals now have another legal document, known as a conservation advice to guide their management.

A conservation advice has been considered a weaker document because it places fewer legal obligations on the government. However, it is quicker to update than a recovery plan.

For years, the environment department has struggled to address a backlog of overdue recovery plans, and in recent years climate-driven disasters have added to that workload by pushing more plants and animals on to the threatened list.

Briefs it prepared after Plibersek took on the portfolio in June state it had been dealing with a “heavy conservation planning workload” and “significant legacy issues”, some of which predated the commencement of the EPBC Act.

The department “has been working to resolve this legacy issue since then”, one brief states, and “there is no point to plans that sit on a shelf gathering dust”.

Close to 200 plans were overdue before an assessment last year determined that hundreds of species previously identified as requiring plans no longer needed them and a conservation advice would be sufficient.

Shortly before the May election, the former environment minister Sussan Ley scrapped the recovery plan requirements for 176 species and habitats.

That act drastically reduced the number of plans that were overdue, which now stands at 28.

Sixteen out of the 28 were “on hold” with most delayed due to “resource constraints”, according to department documents. In the case of a long-awaited recovery plan for the leadbeater’s possum, it had been held up by ongoing talks with the Victorian government.

“Laid bare in the documents is that resource constraints is the reason behind so many decisions,” said Nicola Beynon of Humane Society International.

She said, however, the government chose to reform conservation planning, it must include “a massive injection of funds to do the job of turning around Australia’s extinction crisis” and it was “about time Treasury grasped that fact”.

Tim Beshara of the Wilderness Society said underresourcing “combined with obstructionism from the states has systematically stalled conservation planning and action”.

“It’s absolutely critical that this gets fixed and it’s patently obvious that that is going to need leadership and funding,” he said.

Plibersek said the system designed 20 years ago was not fit to address the multitude of threats to Australian wildlife, particularly climate change.

“As part of the government’s response to Prof Graeme Samuel’s review of the act, I will consider how statutory documents for our imperilled wildlife and places can be better targeted at conservation and recovery needs,” she said.

Earlier this year the department established a taskforce to consider improvements to conservation planning.

A department spokesperson said reform was required and the government “is seriously considering how conservation planning can more effectively address new and changing pressures on wildlife and landscapes, and halt biodiversity decline”.


Lisa Cox

The GuardianTramp

Related Content

Article image
Australian threatened species at risk with no recovery plans finalised in past 18 months
Greens senators say development is being prioritised over environmental protection, putting ‘mining first and the koala last’

Lisa Cox

19, Oct, 2020 @10:48 AM

Article image
'No clue': environment department doesn't know if threatened species plans implemented
Australia has highest rate of mammal extinction in the world but government admits it ‘does not have data’ on plans

Lisa Cox

20, Mar, 2019 @5:00 PM

Article image
One-third of Australia's threatened species are not monitored
Governments often lack necessary data to determine if conservation measures are effective, says review’s leader

Calla Wahlquist

04, May, 2018 @4:48 AM

Article image
Australia quietly adds 49 species to threatened and endangered lists
Brush-tailed bettong, three-toed snake-tooth skink, swift parrot and types of orchid and albatross listed

Elle Hunt

06, May, 2016 @11:00 PM

Article image
Most of Australia’s threatened species not monitored by government, audit finds
Conservation groups say ‘incredibly concerning’ report shows Coalition is failing to protect endangered wildlife

Lisa Cox

17, Mar, 2022 @8:19 AM

Article image
New threatened species strategy won’t overcome Australia’s appalling record, campaigners say
Conservation groups say lack of funding and inadequate environmental laws undermine government’s strategy

Graham Readfearn

21, May, 2021 @3:12 AM

Article image
Threatened species inquiry told public servants think Australia is failing
Union tells Senate inquiry more than 90% of staff working with threatened species say Australia’s performance is poor

Lisa Cox

06, Sep, 2018 @6:00 PM

Article image
Australian populations of threatened bird species halves in 30 years
Migratory shorebirds populations down by average of 70% from 1985 to 2015

Calla Wahlquist

28, Nov, 2018 @7:27 AM

Article image
Conservation plans help boost threatened mammals, scientists find
While some species have declined by more than a third overall, where conservation measures are in place they have increased by 46%

Lisa Cox

22, Apr, 2020 @5:30 PM

Article image
Queensland has systematically failed threatened species, auditor general says in scathing report
Efforts to protect native fauna and flora ‘lack purpose, direction and coordination’, MPs told

Ben Smee

13, Nov, 2018 @11:24 PM