Enormous emissions gap between top 1% and poorest, study highlights

‘Polluting elite’ responsible for same amount of carbon dioxide in a year as poorest 10% are in more than two decades, data shows

The top 1% of earners in the UK are responsible for the same amount of carbon dioxide emissions in a single year as the bottom 10% over more than two decades, new data has shown.

The findings highlight the enormous gaps between what have been termed “the polluting elite”, whose high-carbon lifestyles fuel the climate crisis, and the majority of people, even in developed countries, whose carbon footprints are far smaller.

It would take 26 years for a low earner to produce as much carbon dioxide as the richest do in a year, according to Autonomy’s analysis of income and greenhouse gas data from 1998 to 2018, which found that people earning £170,000 or more in 2018 in the UK were responsible for greenhouse gas emissions far greater than the 30% of people earning £21,500 or less in the same year.

The period covered by the dataset ends in 2018, before the Covid-19 pandemic and lockdowns, which disrupted high-carbon activities such as flying.

Autonomy also found that if the UK had started taxing carbon emissions from just the top 1% of income groups two decades ago, the effort could have raised about £126bn by now, which could have gone towards reducing greenhouse gas emissions in an equitable way, for instance through home insulation for poorer households.

Peter Newell, professor of international relations at the University of Sussex, who was not involved in the Autonomy report but has worked extensively on the “polluting elite”, told the Guardian the massive gap should be addressed.

“‘This new report on the benefits of taxing extreme carbon emitters makes for shocking reading,” he said. “On the eve of a critical climate summit [Cop27] in Egypt, and staring down an unprecedented cost of living crisis, it is clear we are not all in this together. Revenue raised from a carbon tax on the wealthiest top 1% of the population would have raised enough money to retrofit nearly 8m homes, keeping us warm this winter and bringing down fuel bills, while providing critical support for renewable energy and making us less dependent on Putin’s gas.”

The UK is not alone in having such a gulf between high and low earners on greenhouse gas emissions. A growing body of research points to the existence of a “polluting elite” whose lifestyles bear little relation to those of the majority of people. This holds true in developed and developing countries, where the poorest tend to be responsible for a tiny amount of greenhouse gas emissions, while those with most wealth are comparable in their impact with the elite of rich countries.

For instance, in any given year, fewer than half of people in the UK take a flight. But 1% of people are responsible for one-fifth of the overseas flights taken from the UK.

Flying, driving large, expensive cars, owning multiple homes and travelling between them, eating a diet rich in meat and imports, buying more clothes and imported luxury goods are all reasons for the richest generating far higher carbon footprints. Poorer people tend to stay closer to home in small houses and use public transport, while their expenditure on luxuries and items such as “fast fashion” is much smaller.

Will Stronge, director of research at Autonomy, said: “The enormous release of carbon emissions by the very richest in society over the past few decades is astonishing. Our analysis suggests that the most effective way for the government to tackle climate change would be to properly tax the rich, through a well-targeted carbon tax scheme.”

Taxes on the most polluting activities could target only the rich and need not add to the cost of living crisis for the great majority of people. They could also help to plug the yawning gap in the UK’s public finances.

However, the government has preferred to reduce taxes on activities such as flying and driving, despite their environmental impact.

Stronge said the actions taken by most people, such as turning off lights to save energy, would “make no difference if the government doesn’t address the fact it’s the rich who are disproportionately responsible for the climate crisis”.

Adrian Ramsay, co-leader of the Green party, said: “Last year, the Green party called for the UK to show genuine global leadership by introducing a carbon tax at Cop26. As this report demonstrates, such a tax could be a key lever in driving the transition to a cleaner and greener economy.

“But it is also only fair that the top 1% of UK earners, who are disproportionately responsible for such a large amount of the UK’s greenhouse gas emissions, pay a wealth tax. A modest tax on the wealthiest 1% of households could raise in the region of £70bn and be used to contribute significantly to funding a nationwide home insulation programme, creating warmer, more comfortable homes and bringing bills down for good. Such a tax will particularly benefit the poorest 10%, who are the least responsible for the UK’s carbon emissions.”

Contributor

Fiona Harvey

The GuardianTramp

Related Content

Article image
World's richest 1% cause double CO2 emissions of poorest 50%, says Oxfam
Charity says world’s fast-shrinking carbon budget should be used to improve lot of poorest

Fiona Harvey Environment correspondent

20, Sep, 2020 @11:01 PM

Article image
Ban private jets to address climate crisis, says Thomas Piketty
French economist says class inequality must be at centre of climate response and calls for progressive carbon taxes

Fiona Harvey Environment editor

22, Nov, 2023 @4:02 PM

Article image
Carbon pricing would raise trillions needed to tackle climate crisis, says IMF
Traditionally unpopular carbon taxes could be achieved with regulatory compliance, IMF head tells Cop 28

Fiona Harvey in Dubai

07, Dec, 2023 @5:00 AM

Article image
Emissions divide now greater within countries than between them – study
Report finds ‘relatively small group’ of rich people contribute disproportionately to emissions

Fiona Harvey Environment editor

31, Jan, 2023 @7:00 AM

Article image
Global greenhouse gas emissions at all-time high, study finds
Scientists say world is burning through ‘carbon budget’ that can be emitted while staying below 1.5C

Fiona Harvey in Bonn

08, Jun, 2023 @8:00 AM

Article image
The jet set: 200 celebrities’ aircraft have flown for combined total of 11 years since 2022
Jets belonging to entertainers, CEOs, oligarchs and billionaires produce equivalent to emissions of almost 40,000 Britons

Michael Goodier and Niels de Hoog

21, Nov, 2023 @1:00 PM

Article image
Capturing Cop28 chief’s oil firm emissions would take centuries – study
Analysis deems technology promoted by Sultan Ahmed Al Jaber ‘dangerous red herring’

Matthew Taylor

15, Nov, 2023 @3:00 PM

Article image
Healthy diet in UK at risk from Mediterranean droughts, experts say
Fresh fruit and vegetables from Europe will be more expensive as drought and wildfires shrink supplies

Helena Horton Environment reporter

14, Aug, 2023 @10:29 AM

Article image
Top 10 hedge funds made £1.5bn profit from Ukraine war food price spike
Analysis raises questions over role of speculators in inflating food prices amid global cost of living crisis

Fiona Harvey Environment editor

14, Apr, 2023 @11:00 AM

Article image
Experts call for ‘loss and damage’ fund for nature in developing world
Rich nations should pay for biodiversity loss, which disproportionately affects poor countries, say scientists

Phoebe Weston

29, May, 2023 @3:00 PM