Sewage vote outcry prompts Tory MPs to defend decision on social media

Conservative politicians release almost identical statements following anger over rejection of environment bill amendment

The government has launched a defensive social media campaign after MPs faced anger from their constituents over last week’s sewage vote, in which an amendment to the environment bill that would have placed a legal duty on water companies not to pump waste into rivers was voted down.

Many Conservative MPs posted almost identical statements on Monday morning after a weekend of anger over the vote. Government sources confirmed to the Guardian that the information in these posts had been supplied by No 10.

MPs including Steve Brine, Ben Everitt, Michael Fabricant, Anne Marie Morris and Sally-Ann Hart published similar “explainers” about the vote on their websites.

They argue that the amendment did not include an impact assessment, and the costs incurred by immediately banning sewage spills would be too great.

The statement reads: “To eliminate storm overflows means transforming the entire Victorian sewage system to a whole new sewage system. It would be irresponsible for any government to spend an estimated preliminary cost of anywhere between £150bn to £650bn to transform the entire sewage system. This is a huge amount to spend in an ordinary time, let alone at a time of a continuing health pandemic.

“To give some perspective, £150bn is more than the entire schools, policing and defence budget put together and £650bn is billions more than we have spent on supporting livelihoods and jobs throughout the health pandemic.”

Only 22 Conservatives rebelled against the government last week, after the environment secretary, George Eustice, recommended that MPs vote against the amendment.

Martin Salter, the chief policy adviser of the Angling Trust, said: “We know from the unconvincing, identikit replies received by our members that government MPs had been instructed to issue with a standard response to constituents which avoided the question of taking action to combat sewage pollution in favour of yet more endless monitoring.

“There is clearly going to be a battle between the Lords and Commons on this important issue and we intend to keep up the pressure for as long as we can.

“Our rivers are badly polluted and cannot wait for more plans and reports. It seriously questions the government’s commitments to leaving the environment in a better state than when they took office.”

A widespread social media campaign involved constituents posting photographs of their MPs online and asking why they voted against the amendment.

The former Undertones singer Feargal Sharkey, who has been a driving force behind the campaign, was vying for a rather different number one as he rallied his fans on Twitter to keep putting pressure on their MPs. He said: “Currently trending at Number 3 in the UK is #Sewage. Let’s make it Number 1.”

Joan Edwards, the director of policy and public affairs for the Wildlife Trusts, said: “Our rivers and seas are the bedrock of our biodiversity. But, chemicals, sewage and manure continue to pour almost unabated into our already polluted waterways. It is disappointing therefore that the government removed an amendment to the environment bill that would have placed a legal duty on water companies to reduce harm caused by sewage discharges.”

There has been consternation inside government at the way the vote on the amendment last week has been portrayed, with insiders insisting that if the measures had been adopted they would have added a huge cost to water companies that would then have seen them write a “blank cheque” to pass on to consumers.

One Tory MP said the size of the rebellion last week had also caused concern, and the government was – ironically – “shitting themselves”. The rebellion could grow further if Conservative backbenchers who abstained last time switched to supporting the amendment when it is likely to be reintroduced by the Lords on Tuesday.

A government source said they would not accept the same amendment because it would have huge implications – including potentially digging up people’s homes and businesses – but signalled they were open to further compromise. They said: “Our door is very much open. We’re willing and ready to engage and are doing a lot of work in this area.”

The health minister Maria Caulfield criticised those who were lobbying their MPs on social media.

She said: “None of us voted to discharge sewage into the sea and those of who have spread lies and misinformation should hang their heads in shame. Don’t ask why MPs get death threats if you have been part of this today #toxic.”

The vote came seven weeks after wastewater plants were given permission by the government to dispose of sewage not fully treated because of a shortage of chemicals resulting from a lack of HGV drivers.

The sewage measure, introduced in the Lords by the Duke of Wellington, is due to return to the upper house on Tuesday, where it is expected to be sent back to the Commons for another vote by MPs.

There were 403,171 spills of sewage into England’s rivers and seas in 2020, according to the Environment Agency, adding up to over 3.1m hours of spillages.

Contributors

Helena Horton and Aubrey Allegretti

The GuardianTramp

Related Content

Article image
UK government U-turns on sewage after Tory MPs threaten rebellion
Water companies will have duty to reduce impact of sewage discharges from storm overflows

Helena Horton

26, Oct, 2021 @5:39 PM

Article image
UK's new air pollution plan dismissed as 'weak' and 'woefully inadequate'
Lawyers who forced ministers to deliver new proposals to tackle toxic air crisis say government is not taking responsibility for public health emergency

Damian Carrington Environment editor

05, May, 2017 @2:46 PM

Article image
Air pollution plan: sacrificing the nation's health to save an election campaign
Damian Carrington: Penalising UK drivers in the heat of an election campaign promises a political car crash, so the government has hit the brakes and slammed clean air policy into reverse

Damian Carrington Environment editor

05, May, 2017 @4:26 PM

Article image
Exclusive: water firms discharged raw sewage into England's rivers 200,000 times in 2019
Untreated effluent flowed into waterways for more than 1.5m hours, data shows

Sandra Laville and Niamh McIntyre

01, Jul, 2020 @2:00 PM

Article image
Scientists and climate advisers condemn Tory environmental record
Party under pressure on climate crisis as Corbyn says Johnson can not be trusted

Sandra Laville and Matthew Taylor

17, Nov, 2019 @4:00 PM

Article image
MP calls for crackdown on raw sewage discharges in English rivers
Tory Philip Dunne says he wants to ‘introduce water firms to polluter pays’ principle and launches private member’s bill

Sandra Laville Environment correspondent

02, Jul, 2020 @2:00 PM

Article image
Cross-party bloc of MPs back action on sewage discharge into rivers
Private member’s bill seeks to ensure water firms do more to clean up their act on untreated waste

Sandra Laville

09, Jan, 2021 @8:00 AM

Article image
Latest legal challenge to Tory air pollution plans fails
High court instructs ministers to publish full proposals by the end of July

Matthew Taylor

05, Jul, 2017 @1:14 PM

Article image
Stir up the waters: how campaigners forced the UK to U-turn on raw sewage
Social media outrage and viral footage of effluent discharging into the sea forced the government to change course

Sandra Laville and Helena Horton

29, Oct, 2021 @10:22 AM

Article image
MPs set to reject move to make water firms cut sewage discharges
Government opposes proposed amendment to environment bill designed to protect rivers

Sandra Laville

20, Oct, 2021 @10:59 AM