Woodside quizzed on business and environmental concerns about WA gas project

Chief executive Meg O’Neill says gas from Scarborough project will help customers in Asia transition away from coal

Energy giant Woodside has sought to play down concerns about the company’s decision to push ahead on controversial plans to develop the Scarborough gas field in Western Australia.

Woodside chief executive Meg O’Neill faced questions during an investor update on Tuesday about the company’s $16.2b bet to open up the 800 sq km gas field in north-west Western Australia – an area larger than Singapore – and expand its onshore production capacity.

While the company has billed the project as “transformative”, O’Neill was challenged on whether it would live up to its hype. She was also asked about its environmental impact, which has been described as a “disaster”.

But O’Neill rejected defended the company’s commitment to the environment, saying Woodside would cut its carbon emissions by 30% by 2030 through improving the efficiency of its processing plants.

“Designing our emissions is always our first preference, and one of the three key pillars of our carbon strategy,” O’Neill said. “I want to emphasise the point that we can both develop Scarborough and achieve our emissions reductions targets.”

O’Neill also said the gas extracted from Scarborough would serve as a transition for its customers in Asia who are increasingly moving away from coal.

The International Energy Agency said in May that limiting global heating to 1.5C, a goal set out in the Paris agreement, meant exploration and exploitation of new fossil fuel basins had to stop this year.

Woodside has already faced concerns about the cost of cleaning up and dismantling 180 existing gas wells on WA’s north-west shelf – an existing gas field that is now running thin.

Mark Ogge, principal adviser at The Australia Institute, said the company was being selective about how it counted its emissions.

“If you burn fossil fuel, it creates emissions,” Ogge said. “Scarborough gas is not a transition fuel, it is displacing renewables, not coal.”

A report by the Conservation Council of Western Australia and the Australia Institute released in June found the project would release 1.6bn tonnes of greenhouse gases across its lifetime – or the equivalent of 15 coal-fired power plants.

Under the company’s carbon abatement plan, Woodside will be allowed to increase its emissions over the next decade before attempting to reach net zero by 2050.

O’Neill also rejected suggestions the Scarborough gas project was a risky investment.

“We have great confidence in the quality of the project,” she said. “It starts at the resources, so we have great confidence in the quality of the resource. All of the technical work, the execution planning, the detailed design is well underway.

“Now we have [a final investment decision] we have a clear message to the market that this is a de-risked project.”

Woodside is also depending on the price of liquified natural gas remaining high until 2026, when the field is expected to enter production . That will be at a time when competitive projects will have come online as the world shifts away from its reliance on fossil fuels.

Contributor

Royce Kurmelovs

The GuardianTramp

Related Content

Article image
Campaigners ‘dumbfounded’ by abatement plan that will let Woodside increase emissions in WA
Greenhouse gases produced by Pluto LNG plant in Pilbara will balloon in short term, climate activists say

Adam Morton Environment editor

09, Jun, 2021 @5:06 AM

Article image
WA court challenge launched against huge Burrup Hub gas project
Environment group says plan led by Woodside is ‘most polluting fossil fuel project ever to be proposed in Australia’

Graham Readfearn

21, Dec, 2020 @8:47 AM

Article image
Burrup Hub gas project could release 13 times Australia’s annual carbon emissions, analysis suggests
Greenpeace-led research discussed in Canberra with independent Kate Chaney saying politicians need to understand ‘sheer scale’ of what is planned in WA

Adam Morton Climate and environment editor

27, Nov, 2023 @4:05 AM

Article image
Conservationists in court bid to halt $16bn Scarborough gas project citing damage to barrier reef
Australian Conservation Foundation says global heating from fossil fuel development will compound coral bleaching on Great Barrier Reef

Adam Morton Climate and environment editor

21, Jun, 2022 @5:30 PM

Article image
Federal government gives environmental approval to controversial $3.6bn Narrabri gas project
The approval is the final major regulatory hurdle for the project, but environmentalists and critics have vowed to keep fighting it

Graham Readfearn

24, Nov, 2020 @8:43 AM

Article image
Australia's carbon emissions fall just 0.3% as industrial pollution surges
Emissions from electricity generation and agriculture decline, but tiny overall decline shows shortcomings of Coalition policy

Adam Morton Environment editor

24, Feb, 2020 @1:36 AM

Article image
Labor is sending mixed messages on energy – and some of it sounds like climate denial | Adam Morton
The release of vast new areas along the Australian coast for oil and gas exploration is undermining proclamations about creating a cleaner economy

Adam Morton

28, Aug, 2022 @5:30 PM

Article image
Woodside faces Indigenous legal challenge to seismic blasting at WA gas site
Traditional owner alleges company failed to adequately consult on effect of Scarborough project blasting on sea country

Lisa Cox

18, Aug, 2023 @9:02 AM

Article image
Offshore oil regulator ‘avoiding scrutiny’ over approval for Woodside blasting and drilling
Environmental lawyers concerned Nopsema has not published its reasons for approving work at Scarborough gas development

Lisa Cox

06, Dec, 2023 @2:00 PM

Article image
Half of Australia's emissions increase linked to WA's Gorgon LNG plant
Carbon emissions from nation’s largest LNG development were meant to be captured. More than two years on, the storage still hasn’t started

Adam Morton

13, Nov, 2018 @11:03 PM