Great Barrier Reef: advisers call for cap on farm pollution

Taskforce head reportedly tells Queensland government ‘we’re stuffed with a capital S’ if water quality isn’t improved

A cap on pollution from farms close to the Great Barrier Reef has been proposed by advisers to the Queensland government.

The Great Barrier Reef water science taskforce, which advises the Queensland government on how to meet pollution targets on the reef, said sugar cane, grazing and other sectors should be given pollution load limits for their industries in each catchment. It also called for incentives such as auctions for pollution reduction, greater monitoring and regulation, along with “significantly more investment” in the problem.

The Labor state government said it would adopt some of the recommendations immediately, and use the recommendations to guide $90m the government committed to spend on reef water quality before being elected.

The report was hailed as a “game changer” by some conservationists, while others called for the costings behind it to be released immediately.

Steven Miles, the Queensland environment minister, said: “There are a number of actions recommended by the taskforce that we can begin to implement immediately.”

Among them, the government would spend $33.5m on two projects to limit fertiliser and pesticide runoff from the northern wet tropics, and to limit sediment from the southern Burdekin region.

They would also spend $20m to support changes in land management, which would limit pollution, and $11m on greater water quality monitoring, which could provide information to farmers.

The majority of water pollution hitting the Great Barrier Reef comes from farms along the rivers that feed into the Queensland coast. Land clearing also increases the amount of sediment pollution.

Minimising water pollution would make coral and seagrass more resilient to the biggest problems the reef faces, as a result of climate change.

At a press conference, Queensland’s chief scientist Geoff Garrett, who led the taskforce, reportedly said “we’re stuffed with a capital S” if water quality isn’t improved.

'We're stuffed with a capital S' if we don't manage run off on the reef says Qld Chief Scientist #greatbarrierreef pic.twitter.com/M8AzPmlk7q

— Shane Doherty (@ShaneDoherty9) May 25, 2016

In a statement Garrett said: “While we acknowledge the efforts to date, it is abundantly clear that more widespread and rapid action is required.”

“Achieving the water quality targets in the timescale proposed is likely to be well beyond the funds currently allocated by the Queensland and Australian governments.”

The Queensland government had targets of reducing reducing nitrogen pollution by up to 80% and sediment by up to 50% by 2025. The cost of achieving that was the subject of another report, which has been completed but is undergoing review.

Jon Brodie, a reef and water quality expert from James Cook University, said the recommendations on water quality were sensible.

Imogen Zethoven, the Great Barrier Reef campaign director for the Australian Marine Conservation Society, said that report needed to be released immediately so voters could properly evaluate the commitments parties were making in the federal election campaign.

“The public deserves to know what investment is needed to save the reef,” she said.

WWF spokesman Sean Hoobin hailed the report as a “game changer”.

“A catchment cap on pollution which reduces over time, is needed to ensure the reef gets the clean water it needs to restore its health,” Hoobin said.

“A cap is best achieved through federal laws and we are calling for the major parties to announce they would legislate pollution limits to deliver clean water to the reef by 2025.”

Contributor

Michael Slezak

The GuardianTramp

Related Content

Article image
Great Barrier Reef needs $10bn for chance of survival, scientists say
This election is Australia’s last chance to save the reef, which requires $1bn a year for 10 years to reduce water pollution to give it a chance to survive climate change, report warns

Michael Slezak

19, May, 2016 @1:25 AM

Article image
Great Barrier Reef: Unesco pushes for tree-clearing controls
UN agency recognises ‘importance of strengthening our vegetation protection laws’, Queensland’s Jackie Trad says

Joshua Robertson

27, Sep, 2016 @6:39 AM

Article image
Great Barrier Reef progress report: We have to do better on water quality, says Australia
Efforts to curb tree clearing have failed, the government admits in its update to Unesco on work to save the world heritage site

Joshua Robertson and Michael Slezak

01, Dec, 2016 @1:01 PM

Article image
Government bans dumping from new dredging projects into Great Barrier Reef
Environment minister Greg Hunt finalises ban ahead of a UN decision over whether the reef will be listed ‘in danger’

Oliver Milman

17, May, 2015 @7:41 AM

Article image
Stopping global warming is only way to save Great Barrier Reef, scientists warn
Improvements to water quality or fishing controls don’t prevent underwater heatwaves damaging coral, studies of mass bleaching events reveal

Joshua Robertson

15, Mar, 2017 @6:29 PM

Article image
Great Barrier Reef: plan to improve water quality ignores scientific advice
Australian government’s draft Reef 2050 Water Quality Improvement Plan provides new water quality targets, but has very few other concrete changes

Michael Slezak

31, Aug, 2017 @4:00 AM

Article image
Saving Great Barrier Reef from climate change should be central election issue, says Tim Flannery
Scientist says lack of attention to climate change is ‘staggering’ given it is Australia’s last chance ‘to close down coal-fired power stations and save the reef’

Calla Wahlquist

17, May, 2016 @4:00 AM

Article image
Budget earmarks $500m to mitigate Great Barrier Reef climate change
The money will help try to save the reef from crown-of-thorns starfish and reduce pollution, Malcolm Turnbull to announce

Katharine Murphy Political editor

28, Apr, 2018 @8:25 PM

Article image
Great Barrier Reef authority confirms unprecedented sixth mass coral bleaching event
Aerial surveys show almost no reefs across a 1,200km stretch escaping the heat, prompting scientists to call for urgent action on climate crisis

Graham Readfearn

25, Mar, 2022 @4:14 AM

Article image
Great Barrier Reef: Australia must act urgently on water quality, says Unesco
Draft decision says Australia would not, at this rate, meet interim or long-term targets in the Reef 2050 report

Calla Wahlquist

03, Jun, 2017 @3:07 AM