The Guardian view on the Booker: one award with hundreds of judges | Editorial

Many have an opinion on the latest winner of the UK’s top literary prize, Shehan Karunatilaka. It’s a shame not all of them have read his book

Two of the UK’s big culture prizes were announced this week. In music, there was a general buzz of approval as the rapper and actor Little Simz took the Mercury with her fourth album, Sometimes I Might Be Introvert. In the literary arena, reactions were more mixed as this year’s Booker prize was awarded to a second novel by the Sri Lankan novelist Shehan Karunatilaka.

The surprise and, in some quarters, disappointment provoked by the Booker result was not predominantly because the prize’s armchair jurists had read Karunatilaka’s book and found it wanting (up until the announcement, only 4,333 copies had been sold in the UK, according to the industry analysts Nielsen BookScan). It was because, without being that exciting thing – a debut writer – he is a literary outsider, and it’s in the nature of the showboating around the Booker that everyone scraps for a novel they already know.

Though they belong to very different worlds, there are some similarities between the latest Mercury and Booker laureates. Little Simz is a DIY operator who has released all of her albums on her own label. Karunatilaka self-published his first novel. His second, The Seven Moons of Maali Almeida, a bold and uncompromising magical-realist epic set in war-torn Sri Lanka in 1989 and narrated by a ghost, owes its existence to a leap of faith by a tiny independent press, Sort of Books.

However, this cheering story of perseverance and belief was overshadowed by a disheartening backwash on social media, some of it from people who should have known better than to transform disappointment that their favourite had lost into criticism of a winner they hadn’t read. Little Simz knows a thing or two about being trapped by pre-formed opinion. “Instead of sayin ‘simz is underrated’ why don’t you stop being sheep and change the narrative” she tweeted a year ago.

The Booker has always courted controversy, and owes some of its success to the legendary spats it has inspired through the years. Part of the knockabout is to speculate what slant a particular collection of judges will have: will they be populist, high-minded, or simply perverse? However, the foundation stone of any jury prize is that judgment is delegated to a panel whose responsibility is to read, watch or listen carefully and thoughtfully, and reach a consensus.

The Mercury was judged by a panel of 13, who were thought to have got it right. The five-strong Booker jury, chaired by the former director of the British Museum Neil MacGregor, may or may not have done so. There is nothing wrong with disagreeing with their judgment, having read all the contenders. Nor is there any fault in judging a book to be below the gold standard of previous winners. However, it is not only rude but irresponsible and reactionary to wade in without doing the legwork.

The narrative has already changed for Little Simz. Karunatilaka’s Booker win will bring many more readers to his novel, and enable them to make up their own minds. In the meantime, we should celebrate both for who they are, rather than criticise one of them for who he isn’t.

  • Do you have an opinion on the issues raised in this article? If you would like to submit a response of up to 300 words by email to be considered for publication in our letters section, please click here.



The GuardianTramp

Related Content

Article image
The Guardian view on Margaret Atwood and the Booker: a testament to fiction | Editorial
Editorial: The prize has come in for justified criticism, its rules are imperfect. But this year’s authors are an exciting prospect


06, Sep, 2019 @5:25 PM

Article image
The Guardian view on Hilary Mantel: a glorious original | Editorial
Editorial: The author of Wolf Hall will take her own place in history as one of the century’s greatest writers


23, Sep, 2022 @4:54 PM

Article image
The Guardian view on book prizes: don’t forget the children | Editorial
Editorial: In a changing awards landscape, fiction for young readers should not be left out in the cold


27, Jul, 2022 @5:25 PM

Article image
The Guardian view on business and arts: cash without a voice | Editorial
Editorial: Corporate sponsorship needs to steer clear of impinging on artistic freedoms


01, Feb, 2019 @6:25 PM

Article image
The Guardian view on lengthening books: read them and weep | Editorial
Editorial: The judges of the Man Booker prize have complained that some entries needed editing. As titles grow longer, the patience of readers can shorten


21, Sep, 2018 @4:31 PM

Article image
The Guardian view on graphic novels: expanding the literary horizon | Editorial
Editorial: Nick Drnaso’s Sabrina presents the judges with an enviable problem of their own making – how to judge it against novels without pictures


27, Jul, 2018 @4:16 PM

Article image
The Guardian view on book prizes: the more the merrier
Editorial: The Booker prize may have lost some of its prestige, but that allows other awards – and different books – to shine


06, Jun, 2019 @5:25 PM

Article image
The Booker prize judges have exposed the doublethink behind our arts awards | Charlotte Higgins
Naming Margaret Atwood and Bernardine Evaristo joint winners has pulled back the curtain on what we’re told is the ‘best’

Charlotte Higgins

15, Oct, 2019 @5:57 PM

Article image
Mercury prize: Little Simz wins for Sometimes I Might Be Introvert
Rapper and actor, 28, wins for her fourth album after critical acclaim and a decade as a performer

Shaad D'Souza and Laura Snapes

18, Oct, 2022 @9:14 PM

Article image
Mercury prize: Sam Fender, Harry Styles and Self Esteem lead pack of first-time nominees
Women including Little Simz and Jessie Buckley dominate this year’s cohort for the best British album of the year, which falters on recent diversity gains

Laura Snapes

26, Jul, 2022 @10:15 AM