Will Labour really axe the Lords, that laughing stock of democracy? I’ll believe it when I see it | Simon Jenkins

It is time for this institution to be replaced by a council of the people, but Starmer may not have the stomach for reform

The most telling fact about the House of Lords is that not one living prime minister has deigned to darken its door. They know too much of its deals, kickbacks and cronyism to be reminded of them round every corner. Yes, there are impressive peers, but they are captives of a roughly 800-member club that has become the laughing stock of British democracy. Revelations such as those recently in the Guardian about the Conservative peer Michelle Mone have become all too common.

Once again reform is in the air – this time from a former prime minister, Gordon Brown, advising a probable future one, Keir Starmer. Brown is eager for a new chamber to level up the regions and nations of the United Kingdom. Starmer, who recently proposed his controversial colleague Tom Watson for a peerage, is reportedly showing signs of hesitancy. The raw fact is that Lords membership is a potent loyalty weapon in any party leader’s pocket.

Reforming the Lords was the declared intention of Tony Blair and David Cameron. Both failed to convert it into to a truly democratic body, while continuing to “honour” their cronies. In his speech in Leeds on the constitution on Monday, Starmer promised “the biggest ever transfer of power” from Westminster to local and regional government, with additional devolution for Edinburgh and Cardiff. This too has a familiar ring. Blair promised elected mayors and Cameron “metro mayors”, but neither delivered for them effective devolution or, in Cameron’s case, sensible boundaries. Neither stemmed the tide of Scottish and Welsh nationalism. Britain remains hyper-centralised.

This area of the constitution at least matters. Few feel the same about the House of Lords. Hence the murmurings in the lobby by influential peers that Starmer should not waste “political capital” on change . This is how the debate always dissolves, into a top-down search not for a new purpose but for a membership to give the existing chamber legitimacy. Eight-hundred members with an average age of 71 is absurd.

Defenders of the Lords say it brings the wisdom of experience to vet legislation passing through parliament, while adding depth to public debate. But the legislative function can be met by a much-needed broadening of Commons committee stages. These should bring in expert witnesses and hold formal public hearings. The second-debating purpose is certainly of value, but the nation’s voice should not be obscured by the language of aristocracy in a plush retirement home in the metropolis.

Brown is right. The prime purpose of a second chamber should be, as it is in almost every parliament abroad, to reflect the diverse union that comprises most nation states. This is especially urgent in a union which, in Britain’s case, remains almost terminally unstable. But that virtue is undermined by Brown’s belief that the chamber should be directly elected. This would clearly challenge the democratic standing of the Commons. Worse, it would strengthen the patronage base of the big parties and their leaders, precisely what afflicts the present Lords. Political parties must lose ownership of the second chamber.

It is time for the Lords to be replaced by a council of the people. This would be formed of indirectly elected leaders of the nations, counties and cities, as well as representatives of local interests – industrial, professional, cultural and academic. Its function would be deliberative, not legislative. It could be peripatetic, meeting nationwide. Its motions might require a formal Commons response. At the very least, such a senate would offer parliament a refreshing alternative voice and stand much to Starmer’s credit.

  • Simon Jenkins is a Guardian columnist


Simon Jenkins

The GuardianTramp

Related Content

Article image
Labour unveils plan to overhaul constitution and replace the Lords
Gordon Brown’s Commission on the UK’s Future also aims to curb influence of wealth and foreign money

Rowena Mason and Libby Brooks

04, Dec, 2022 @10:30 PM

Article image
Labour may abolish House of Lords if it wins next election, leaked report reveals
Exclusive: Constitutional review by Gordon Brown also recommends devolving economic powers

Jessica Elgot Chief political correspondent

22, Sep, 2022 @6:30 PM

Article image
Keir Starmer, if you really believe in a Labour government, tell us why we should believe in it too | Andy Beckett
With Truss fuelling poverty and inequality, Starmer needs to show he’s ready for a titanic battle, says Guardian columnist Andy Beckett

Andy Beckett

22, Sep, 2022 @1:14 PM

Article image
Keir Starmer warned by Labour peers not to waste political capital on Lords reform
Policy could distract party from pushing through other urgent measures, leader is told

Toby Helm

04, Dec, 2022 @7:15 AM

Article image
Keir Starmer: I will abolish House of Lords to ‘restore trust in politics’
Exclusive: Labour leader plans a new elected chamber after accusing successive Tory governments of handing peerages to ‘lackeys and donors’

Michael Savage Policy editor

19, Nov, 2022 @7:30 PM

Article image
Democracy is dead in Keir Starmer’s Labour | Ken Loach
Criticism of the leader is forbidden, while thousands of members have been expelled or left in disgust, says film director Ken Loach

Ken Loach

28, Sep, 2021 @5:01 PM

Article image
Labour plan to reform constitution will end ‘sticking plaster politics’, says Starmer
Proposals, including abolishing House of Lords, aimed at moving power away from London

Peter Walker, Jessica Elgot and Severin Carrell

05, Dec, 2022 @6:49 PM

Article image
Labour backing a second referendum shows democracy is working beautifully | Zoe Williams
Getting there was a messy process. But the party’s new stance is the product of grassroots decision-making, says Guardian columnist Zoe Williams

Zoe Williams

25, Sep, 2018 @5:00 PM

Article image
Labour leadership: Starmer secures place on final ballot by getting Usdaw nomination – as it happened
Rolling coverage of the day’s political developments as they happen

Andrew Sparrow and Kevin Rawlinson

20, Jan, 2020 @6:42 PM

Article image
As parliament returns, Covid-19 shows why we need more constructive politics | Rafael Behr
A semi-digital Westminster will mean less posturing and preening by MPs. That suits the crisis we’re in, says Guardian columnist Rafael Behr

Rafael Behr

21, Apr, 2020 @4:36 PM