Money isn’t restricted by borders, so why are people? | Giles Fraser: Loose canon

Capital is an economic migrant and its unrestricted movement threatens national sovereignty. Surely people should be just as free

Theresa May won’t be around in the early 22nd century when, according to Star Trek at least, Dr Emory Erickson will have invented the transporter – a device that will be able to dematerialise a person into an energy pattern, beam them to another place or planet, and then rematerialise them back again. In such a world people will be able to move as quickly and freely as an email.

The philosopher Derek Parfit has rightly questioned whether such a thing is even philosophically possible: will the rematerialised person be the same person as the dematerialised one, or just a perfect copy. (What would happen if two copies of me were rematerialised? Would they both be me?) Parfit thus raises a fascinating philosophical question about what we mean by personal identity – or what makes me me.

But, just for the sake of argument, imagine what such a device would do to Mrs May’s keep-them-all-out immigration policy. With the transporter, there could be no border controls and no restrictions on the free movement of individuals. Economic migrants would love it. People will be able to live and work where they like, beaming instantly from Syria to Sussex or indeed to Saturn. And because of this, the whole concept of the nation state will eventually wither away. People will have become more powerful than the state.

Fanciful? Of course. Forget about the technical problems. The fundamental problem is that human beings are not fungible. A copy is not the same as its original. A person cannot be dematerialised into a series of digital zeros and ones, get beamed over space and be rematerialised as the same person.

But – and here is the really big thing – money can be. For the whole point about money is that it is fungible. It can be converted into zeros and ones and it can be digitally shot across space. And since the late 1970s, when capital controls were relaxed all around the world, and then even more so since the digital revolution, money has been able to go where it pleases, unimpeded, without any need for a passport or reference to border control. Every day, trillions of dollars are economic migrants, crossing boundaries as if they didn’t exist, pouring in and out of countries looking for the most economically advantageous place to be. And, just as with the fanciful people-transporter example, this free movement of capital is how the nation state is dissolving.

This week the OECD published a report on international companies and tax avoidance. Big companies like AstraZeneca are able to pay next to no tax in the UK because they just transport their profits to a low-tax regime in another country. Indeed, some countries, pathetically prostrating themselves before the gods of finance, exist for little other than this purpose. And so the situation we find ourselves in is that money is free to travel as it pleases but people are not. We have got used to this as the new normal, and it largely goes unremarked. Yes, there are a few on the libertarian fringe who recognise this as a contradiction and argue that people should be as free as capital. But the majority on the right do everything they can to protect the free movement of capital and restrict the free movement of people.

Which is why the neoliberal right in Britain has utterly contradictory instincts over Europe – they want the free trade bit but they don’t want the free people bit. And they scare us with how the free movement of people threatens our national identity but refuse to face the fact that the free movement of capital can be seen as doing exactly the same. They talk a good game about the importance of freedom: but it’s one rule for capital and another for people.

Of course the transporter won’t happen. But with the internet, the imagination can travel where it will. And that means poor people will always see and want what rich people have. And not even Mrs May will be able to stop them crossing dangerous seas and borders to find it.

@giles_fraser

Contributor

Giles Fraser

The GuardianTramp

Related Content

Article image
The fantasy of the beautiful nomad is morally bankrupt | Giles Fraser: Loose canon
Loose canon: Liberalism is like living in a posh hotel, with no place to call home

Giles Fraser

15, Sep, 2016 @3:29 PM

Article image
Rejoice! Centrism in British politics is dead and big ideas are back | Giles Fraser: Loose canon
Loose canon: Centrists claim that the middle ground is where grown-ups do politics. It isn’t. It’s where the elite try to manage things into staying the same

Giles Fraser

29, Jun, 2017 @4:02 PM

Article image
National borders exist to pen poor people into reservations of poverty | Giles Fraser: Loose canon
Giles Fraser: Why, in this era of advanced globalisation, do we believe in free trade and the free movement of goods, but not in the free movement of labour?

Giles Fraser

02, Jun, 2016 @3:14 PM

Article image
The Levellers and the Diggers were the original Eurosceptics | Giles Fraser: Loose canon
Loose canon: Democracy requires an intimate link between people and power. The EU has severed that link and turned itself into a club for big business

Giles Fraser

11, Feb, 2016 @4:06 PM

Article image
Liberal capitalism has rotted our souls. But its days might be numbered | Giles Fraser: Loose canon
Loose canon: It will be a long road back from the Blair/Thatcher consensus. But this election finally gives us leaders who prioritise morality over the market

Giles Fraser

20, Apr, 2017 @12:21 PM

Article image
The refugees in Hungary remind me why I’m still a Zionist | Giles Fraser: Loose canon
Loose canon: But Israel, by rejecting those fleeing violent racism, has betrayed the vision of its foundation

Giles Fraser

11, Sep, 2015 @11:35 AM

Article image
Brexit recycles the defiant spirit of the Reformation | Loose canon
Loose canon: There is a considerably higher prevalence of Euroscepticism in traditionally Protestant countries than in traditionally Roman Catholic ones. And this should be unsurprising

Giles Fraser

05, May, 2016 @5:15 PM

Article image
The world is getting more religious, because the poor go for God | Giles Fraser: Loose canon
Loose canon: Religion itself thrives in places where liberal individualism fails. That’s the real clash of civilisations

Giles Fraser

26, May, 2016 @4:25 PM

Article image
Diversity can distract us from economic inequality | Giles Fraser | Loose canon
Loose canon: Donald Trump got elected because the liberal elite didn’t care enough about the gap between rich and poor

Giles Fraser

17, Nov, 2016 @4:17 PM

Article image
Why our landed gentry are so desperate to stay in the EU | Giles Fraser: Loose canon
Loose canon: The common agricultural policy takes from the poor and gives to the rich. Its effects can be felt in every British household, and seen in the deadly waters of the Mediterranean too

Giles Fraser

21, Apr, 2016 @3:46 PM