‘Right decision’ to scrap French submarines but South Australian jobs will be lost

Senator Rex Patrick says there were doubts over the Shortfin Barracuda but ‘it’s a huge jump’ to building a nuclear submarine

About 350 Naval Group Australia jobs will be lost with the decision to scrap Australia’s current $90bn submarine project and replace it with a plan to build nuclear submarines in Adelaide.

Despite anxiety in South Australia over potential job losses, and uncertainty about the future of some supply chain companies dedicated to the existing French project, observers said the move was necessary.

Former defence industry minister Christopher Pyne, who oversaw critical parts of the deal with Naval Group, acknowledged on Thursday it had to happen – while insisting it was not the French company’s fault.

Pyne wrote in the Advertiser that the new Aukus alliance with the US and the UK was a “game-changer”, granting Australia access to new technologies so it could build nuclear submarines without a sovereign nuclear capability.

“The technology means that once the nuclear reactor is operational inside the submarine, powering its propulsion, it doesn’t need to be dismantled, recharged, have its nuclear fuel rods replaced or in any other way interfered with for 33 years, which is the lifespan of the submarine,” he wrote.

Australia must be careful not to “jump out of the frying pan and into the fire”, South Australian senator Rex Patrick said.

“I’m pleased the government has left the Shortfin Barracuda [French submarine] program … it was running late already, it wasn’t meeting expectations in terms of industry engagement and there are questions about whether it would give us a regionally superior submarine.

“But it’s a huge jump to … building a nuclear submarine. We need to make sure the very capable people in the workforce are not lost to other industries.”

Patrick will push for an inquiry into the process. He said it’s still unknown what sort of submarine will be chosen, where the nuclear work will be done, and how people will feel about nuclear reactors inside submarines on Australian territory.

“It’s the right decision to walk away, but you cannot ignore the billions of dollars spent,” he said.

The SA Greens are already set to fight the “dangerous deal” that they say “puts a target on the state’s back”. Senator Sarah Hanson-Young said it was a “serious escalation in our military policy and spending” and called for the government to create “clean, green” jobs.

The nuclear option was taken off the table initially because Australia does not have a domestic nuclear capability. However, if the nuclear work is all carried out in the United States or the United Kingdom, experts say Australia could do the rest here – assuming any legislative and political hurdles are overcome.

Pyne wrote that the lack of a civil nuclear industry was an “insurmountable hurdle” when Australia chose the French option in 2015-16, but access to the US technology removed that hurdle.

Brent Clark, the chief executive of the Australian Industry and Defence Network (AIDN), was the head of Naval Group Australia/DCNS at the time the main contractual architecture was built.

He said AIDN’s sympathies were with the current Naval Group Australia employees. “They’ll be hurting at this time,” he said, adding that there were also many Australian companies that had either secured contracts or made investments based on the existing deal to build diesel-electric submarines in Australia.

“The government needs to be mindful that those companies have every opportunity to get work,” he said.

Sign up to receive an email with the top stories from Guardian Australia every morning

“This is a momentous occasion for Australia … we have no doubt the Australian industry is capable of stepping up.”

Clark said it would be “common practice” for the United States or the United Kingdom to build and maintain the nuclear part of the submarine, leaving Australia with all the non-nuclear work.

The contract with France was written with several built-in escape clauses. Although the details remain secret, the Australian National Audit Office said the agreement “contains rights, remedies and incentives, including protections, ‘control gates’ in the form of mandated system reviews based on defined exit and entry criteria, and establishes contractual off-ramps”.

The ABC reported in 2019 that the confidential overarching contract – the strategic partnering agreement – would see Australia pay about $400m if it pulled out after the design was completed but before a submarine was completed.

Australian Strategic Policy Institute senior defence analyst Andrew Davies said it was usually really hard to “put a stake through the heart of a defence project”, because of the costs and commitment already sunk into them. He said that amount of money was relatively low. “It may be a rare example of Australia having negotiated effectively,” he said.

“With the off ramps, given the trouble the project is in, and the fact it’s going to deliver too little too late, it’s a remarkable bargain.”

Davies said that the existing fleet of 12 Collins-class submarines were already going to have to have their lives extended to avoid a capability gap that would leave Australia under-resourced. The new plan could run to a similar timeline to the old one, delivering submarines through the 2030s and into the 2040s, he said.

Naval Group has expressed its “major disappointment” at the program’s scrapping, a move that could see about 350 Australian-based staff lose their jobs.

The Australian Shipbuilding Federation of Unions national convener Glenn Thompson said thousands of workers’ jobs had been thrown into doubt and called for more detail on the plan.

SA premier Steven Marshall welcomed the “fabulous new nuclear-powered fleet”. He said the announcement, along with a decision to keep deep maintenance work on the Collins class in Adelaide (instead of moving it to Western Australia), cemented SA as “the maritime capital of the nation”. Prime minister Scott Morrison has promised other naval shipbuilding work to Western Australia.

Contributor

Tory Shepherd

The GuardianTramp

Related Content

Article image
What are nuclear-powered submarines, anyway? A guide to Australia’s looming military addition
How do they work? What are the pros and cons? We break down the technology in the defence deal with the US and UK

Royce Kurmelovs

16, Sep, 2021 @6:53 AM

Article image
The nuclear option: why has Australia ditched the French submarine plan for the Aukus pact?
Just two weeks before the bombshell, senior ministers from both countries met and declared they were ‘committed to cooperation’. How did it all go so wrong?

Daniel Hurst

17, Sep, 2021 @8:00 PM

Article image
Australia nuclear submarine deal: Aukus defence pact with US and UK means $90bn contract with France will be scrapped
Scott Morrison says nuclear-powered submarines will be built in Adelaide under the Aukus framework announced with Joe Biden and Boris Johnson

Katharine Murphy and Daniel Hurst

16, Sep, 2021 @1:41 AM

Article image
Diplomacy dialled up to 11: Australia saddles up with US as Indo-Pacific heads for cold war | Katharine Murphy
Australia didn’t announce the ‘forever partnership’ while Donald Trump was in the White House. What happens if he returns?

Katharine Murphy

16, Sep, 2021 @9:40 AM

Article image
‘That fella down under’: Joe Biden forgets Scott Morrison’s name during historic pact announcement
US president calls Australian prime minister ‘that fella down under’ at press conference for new trilateral security partnership

Justine Landis-Hanley

16, Sep, 2021 @4:14 AM

Article image
Game-changer or irresponsible? The known unknowns on Australia’s nuclear submarine deal
Analysis: Stay tuned as we battle the notoriously secret defence establishment to work out what we are getting and when, and maybe why and whether it’s worth it

Tory Shepherd

17, Sep, 2021 @8:35 AM

Article image
New national hotel quarantine worker testing rules announced – as it happened
SA introduces ‘wide-ranging restrictions’ from midnight on Wednesday; $200 vouchers for Victorians to spend in regional areas. This blog is now closed

Calla Wahlquist and Matilda Boseley (earlier)

18, Nov, 2020 @8:32 AM

Article image
Morrison expects US to ramp up military presence in region as China attacks ‘irresponsible’ defence pact
Beijing denounces Aukus pact, raising question of nuclear proliferation, as Morrison expects a greater US military presence in Indo-Pacific and deeper UK defence ties

Daniel Hurst and Katharine Murphy

16, Sep, 2021 @10:34 AM

Article image
Will Morrison’s new ‘forever’ friends speak louder than Barnaby Joyce on climate? | Katharine Murphy
The PM’s Aukus partners, Biden and Johnson, are on a backslapping unity ticket of ambition on combatting global heating

Katharine Murphy

17, Sep, 2021 @10:16 AM

Article image
Aukus row: EU officials demand apology from Australia over France’s treatment before trade talks
Australian prime minister Scott Morrison says he has had ‘no opportunity’ for talks with French president Emmanuel Macron

Amy Remeikis

21, Sep, 2021 @12:48 AM