Christian Porter reveals part of legal fees paid by blind trust with funds from unknown source

Former attorney general says he has ‘no access to information about the conduct and funding of the trust’

Christian Porter has revealed that part of his defamation legal fees were paid by a blind trust with funds from an unknown source.

The industry and science minister updated his register of interests on Monday, revealing that the Legal Services Trust had paid part of the fees for the now discontinued defamation case.

In the declaration, Porter claimed that as he is a potential beneficiary he had “no access to information about the conduct and funding of the trust”. Unlike companies, there is no requirement to register a trust in Australia, meaning details including beneficiaries, trustees and revenues are not publicly available. It is not clear how much of Porter’s legal fees were paid by the trust.

Porter sued the ABC and Louise Milligan over an online article that alleged an unidentified cabinet minister had been accused of rape in January 1988 in a dossier sent to Scott Morrison and three other parliamentarians. Porter subsequently identified himself as the minister and strenuously denied the allegations.

Porter has repeatedly refused to guarantee he would fund the entire cost of the case himself, and in May declined to rule out plans for a supporter to pick up the bill.

In late May, Porter agreed to discontinue the case, after the ABC agreed to add an editor’s note to the article stating that it did not intend to suggest Porter had committed the alleged offence, and that “both parties accept that some readers misinterpreted the article as an accusation of guilt against Mr Porter. That reading, which was not intended by the ABC, is regretted.”

The ABC also agreed to pay Porter’s costs of mediation, but no damages.

In changes to his register of interests, registered on Tuesday, Porter declared additional sources of funding for the court case as an “other interest”.

Porter said he had brought the case, which was finalised on 31 August, and incurred costs “in a purely personal capacity”.

But “out of an abundance of caution” and consistent with other parliamentarians’ practice Porter advised “the following contributions have recently or may shortly be made”:

  • An amount paid by the ABC to his lawyers, Company Giles, and applied to his account

  • “Part contribution to the payment of my fees by a blind trust known as the Legal Services Trust. As a potential beneficiary I have no access to information about the conduct and funding of the trust.”

  • Barrister Sue Chrysanthou, although engaged on a commercial fee arrangement, “did not charge me for all of the time she spent on the matter” and some services were provided “on a reduced fee basis”.

“Although all of the above contributions were made to me, or were for my benefit, in a purely personal capacity, in the interest of transparency and out of an abundance of caution I make this disclosure pursuant to item 14 of the register of members’ interest,” Porter said.

Item 14 requires members to declare “any other interests where a conflict of interest with a member’s public duties could foreseeably arise or be seen to arise”or “holds the potential for a real or apparent conflict of interest with a member’s public duties to arise”.

The shadow attorney general, Mark Dreyfus, called on Scott Morrison to “immediately demand Mr Porter come clean about who his donors are”.

“The Australian people need to know who set this trust up, who funded it, how much they donated,” Dreyfus said in a statement.

“If Mr Porter genuinely doesn’t know who his donors are he shouldn’t accept their money.”

The Centre for Public Integrity said anonymous contributions to politicians, in any form, should not be allowed.

“Hidden money is a huge problem for our democracy,” the centre’s executive director, Han Aulby, said.

“Voters need to know whose interests are being taken into account.”

A spokesman for Porter said he had undertaken disclosure in accordance with the requirements of the register, but declined to say how much of Porter’s fees were covered.

“No taxpayers’ funds were used in meeting the costs of the minister’s actions against the ABC and Milligan, which have now concluded,” he said.

In March, a spokesperson for Porter declined to answer questions from Guardian Australia about whether he was receiving any financial support for the case and Porter similarly deflected questions from news.com.au in May about whether he had a millionaire benefactor.

At the time, the deputy clerk, Peter Banson, told Guardian Australia a member may be required to register legal fees paid on their behalf as a gift “but only once it has been received or realised”.

Asked at a doorstop in May if he had an understanding someone would pay his legal bills, Porter replied: “If there’s anything that requires disclosure … I’ll be doing that as and when the need arises.”

Porter has suggested he will recontest his seat of Pearce, although Labor’s rising popularity in Western Australia has made the usually safe seat, with a 7.5% margin, a potential target.

In May, Porter told Sky News he was “absolutely committed” to the government and it had “never occurred to me to not be a part of that going on because I think I have something to offer as part of that government”.

“I’m completely committed to my electorate – I am completely committed to the government,” he said, without directly confirming he would seek re-election.

Contributor

Paul Karp

The GuardianTramp

Related Content

Article image
Christian Porter v ABC: can the minister sue for defamation over article that didn't name him?
What will be determined by the case? Will it preclude an independent inquiry?

Paul Karp

16, Mar, 2021 @5:27 AM

Article image
Scott Morrison seeks advice on Christian Porter’s blind trust to pay legal fees
The prime minister tells his industry minister he wants the controversy over his acceptance of funding from undisclosed source resolved

Paul Karp and Sarah Martin

15, Sep, 2021 @8:47 AM

Article image
Christian Porter moves to strike out major sections of ABC’s defamation defence
The former attorney general is suing the public broadcaster and is trying to stop parts of its defence being made public

Paul Karp

06, May, 2021 @9:04 AM

Article image
Christian Porter and ABC deal to destroy defamation case documents challenged in court
Former attorney general’s decision to drop his court case against public broadcaster sparks a fierce war of words

Michael McGowan and Paul Karp

01, Jun, 2021 @4:34 AM

Article image
Christian Porter’s legal fees: what is a blind trust and what must MPs disclose?
The minister’s office has said that he has declared what he needs to under the rules

Paul Karp

15, Sep, 2021 @9:20 AM

Article image
Christian Porter lawyers accuse ABC of dragging its feet over defamation trial date
Tense week of negotiations after bid to stop Sue Chrysanthou from appearing for former attorney general in case against broadcaster

Michael McGowan

17, May, 2021 @5:13 AM

Article image
Christian Porter loses bid to block affidavit his lawyers said could ‘derail’ ABC defamation case
Judge rules affidavit from Macquarie Bank’s James Hooke is central to the question of whether barrister Sue Chrysanthou SC can act for Porter in defamation case

Michael McGowan

24, May, 2021 @7:26 AM

Article image
Christian Porter defamation action: ABC engages former solicitor general to lead defence
Justin Gleeson SC was the solicitor general from 2012 to 2016 and served Labor and Liberal prime ministers

Katharine Murphy and Paul Karp

18, Mar, 2021 @10:00 AM

Article image
Christian Porter lawyer has ‘confidential’ information on ABC witness’s ‘weaknesses’, court documents claim
Federal court documents spell out case against Sue Chrysanthou being allowed to act for Porter in his defamation action against the ABC

Michael McGowan

21, May, 2021 @8:37 AM

Article image
Keeping ABC defence secret in Christian Porter case would require ‘special treatment’, court told
News groups argue blocking access to court file from now-dropped defamation case would be inappropriate

Michael McGowan

09, Jul, 2021 @5:11 AM