Government blocks Labor push to investigate Christian Porter’s blind trust

Speaker Tony Smith agrees ‘prima facie case’ to examine whether former attorney general breached disclosure rules but Coalition votes down referral

The Morrison government has blocked Labor’s bid to refer Christian Porter to the privileges committee over his declaration that part of his defamation legal fees were paid by a blind trust with funds from an unknown source.

The Speaker of the house, Tony Smith, on Wednesday agreed there was a “prima facie case” Porter should be investigated for a possible breach of disclosure rules, but the government voted down the referral, the first time that’s happened since federation.

Peter Dutton, the leader of the house, instead asked the privileges committee to clarify the rules after claiming other members faced similar questions about the identity of donors to crowdsourced funds for defamation cases.

The procedural victory means Porter is likely to avoid parliamentary scrutiny of his declaration until the rules are clarified – which may push the issue off the agenda until after the next election. Porter plans to recontest his Western Australian seat of Pearce.

Labor’s Tony Burke in a statement accused the government of protecting Porter so “we may never learn the truth about who paid Mr Porter’s legal bills and what they may expect in return”.

In September, Porter declared that the Legal Services Trust had part-paid his legal fees arising from his private defamation case against the ABC. The former attorney general said as a “potential beneficiary” of the blind trust he had no access to information about the source of the funds.

On Monday, Labor moved to refer Porter to the privileges committee to investigate whether he was in contempt of the House of Representatives resolutions relating to disclosure of members’ interests.

Porter maintains that he has properly disclosed his interests in accordance with both the rules and the ministerial standards, but resigned as a minister in September on the basis the issue had become an “unhelpful distraction” for the government.

On Wednesday, Smith said the purpose of the register was to record interests that “may or may be seen” to conflict with a member’s public duty and he noted that members were advised to “bear in mind the purpose and spirit” of the requirement.

Smith ruled that after “careful consideration” he was “satisfied that a prima facie case has been made out and I’m willing to give precedence to a motion concerning privilege or contempt”.

He noted that “does not imply a conclusion that a breach of privilege or contempt has occurred”.

Burke, the manager of opposition business, then moved for a referral to the privileges committee to consider whether Porter had “created a precedent which threatens the integrity of the register of members’ interests”, had “knowingly provided false or misleading information”, and had committed a contempt of the house.

Burke said since federation “no member of parliament” had used a trust to “receive income and not let anyone know who is paying”.

The Labor leader, Anthony Albanese, said it was “nonsense” that Porter could provide no further details of donors. Albanese questioned “how did they know where to put the money”.

Dutton said Labor’s request to give precedence to a motion did not ask “the Speaker to provide a verdict”, signalling to government MPs that it was open to them to decline to act on the finding a prima facie case existed.

Dutton said the referral raised “a much broader issue”, claiming that “the same transparency issues” arose with members who received reimbursement for legal costs from their political party or used pages such as GoFundMe to crowdsource funds.

Dutton name-checked Sarah Hanson-Young as one senator who had accepted GoFundMe donations and claimed some of her donors had used aliases such as “A Non” and “Anne559” to disguise their identity.

Hanson-Young received eight donations above the $300 threshold, providing names that clearly identified the source, although monikers were allowed for the remaining 1,800 donations below the threshold.

Dutton said he had written to the chair of the privileges committee, Russell Broadbent, to consider the broader issues, claiming this made the referral of Porter “redundant”.

Dutton asked the committee to consider clarifying the rules rather than consider whether Porter had breached the rules as they stand.

Peter Dutton has asked the privileges committee to clarify the rules about declaration of donations for legal funds - but it's no inquiry, and no substitute for a referral into Porter's declaration.#auspol pic.twitter.com/ciG4VC8wc5

— Paul Karp (@Paul_Karp) October 20, 2021

After Dutton advised the government would vote against the referral, the house defeated Labor’s motion 52 votes to 49.

“What the House has just done is unprecedented,” Burke said, warning in the House that the government vote would mean the Australian public would “never find out if someone is bribed” by someone seeking to influence them.

On the day he resigned from the ministry, Porter said in a statement he was “not willing to put pressure on the trust to provide me with any further information … to which I am not entitled”.

Porter said that he did not want to expose people who donated to the trust to “become targets of the social media mob”, deciding to relinquish his cabinet position instead of “seeking to pressure the trust to break individuals’ confidentiality”.

Porter sued the ABC and reporter Louise Milligan over an online article that alleged an unidentified cabinet minister had been accused of rape in January 1988 in a dossier sent to Scott Morrison and three other parliamentarians. Porter subsequently identified himself as the minister and strenuously denied the allegations.

In late May, Porter agreed to discontinue the case, after the ABC agreed to add an editor’s note to the article stating it did not intend to suggest Porter had committed the alleged offence. The ABC agreed to pay Porter’s costs of mediation but not damages.

Hanson-Young told Guardian Australia more than half her donations were less than $20 which is “what a true community crowdfund looks like”.

“I have declared all donations in the spirit of members and senators interests and Mr Porter should do the same,” she said.

Contributor

Paul Karp

The GuardianTramp

Related Content

Article image
Christian Porter’s blind trust should be examined by parliament – but it won’t be and that’s crushingly predictable | Katharine Murphy
Normally referrals to the privileges committee are waved through on the voices but on Wednesday afternoon Peter Dutton bowled up a rude shock

Katharine Murphy

20, Oct, 2021 @10:59 AM

Article image
Christian Porter’s anonymous donation ‘unusual’, federal finance minister says
Simon Birmingham would not be drawn on whether ministers should accept funds without knowing source

Amy Remeikis

19, Sep, 2021 @3:05 AM

Article image
Christian Porter’s legal fees: what is a blind trust and what must MPs disclose?
The minister’s office has said that he has declared what he needs to under the rules

Paul Karp

15, Sep, 2021 @9:20 AM

Article image
Scott Morrison seeks advice on Christian Porter’s blind trust to pay legal fees
The prime minister tells his industry minister he wants the controversy over his acceptance of funding from undisclosed source resolved

Paul Karp and Sarah Martin

15, Sep, 2021 @8:47 AM

Article image
Morrison evades question on when he found out about blind trust payment toward Christian Porter’s legal fees
The PM suggests there may be consequences if Porter breached ministerial guidelines as political pressure on the industry minister grows

Paul Karp

16, Sep, 2021 @5:03 AM

Article image
Labor asks AFP to investigate Coalition appointment to appeals tribunal
Mark Dreyfus says timing of appointment to AAT of failed Liberal preselection candidate Jane Bell is ‘curious’

Amy Remeikis

07, Mar, 2019 @12:55 AM

Article image
Childcare: Coalition to push Labor to support its $3bn package
Christian Porter’s plan includes abolishing the $7,500 cap for families with incomes of $185,710 or less

Gareth Hutchens

20, Oct, 2016 @5:30 PM

Article image
Australian Christian Lobby backs sacking of employees with no ‘Christian sexual ethic’
ACL director Martyn Iles says businesses should have greater powers to hire and fire, but denies Christians have a ‘special vendetta’ against LGBT people

Paul Karp

09, Oct, 2019 @5:42 AM

Article image
Proposal that Christian Porter can return to ‘full-time salary doing part-time work’ further fuel for fury, Labor says
Government’s advice that victims of domestic violence should use super to escape abusers a stark contrast, Kristina Keneally says

Daniel Hurst

21, Mar, 2021 @1:55 AM

Article image
Malcolm Turnbull calls Christian Porter’s anonymous donation a ‘shocking affront to transparency’
Former PM says he was ‘staggered’ that Porter would accept payment of legal fees from ‘blind trust’ without knowing source of the donation

Amy Remeikis, Paul Karp and Christopher Knaus

15, Sep, 2021 @1:12 AM