Australia’s chief scientist says the question facing the nation’s energy future is not about renewables versus coal but how best to create “a whole-of-economy emissions reduction strategy”.

In a prerecorded interview with Sky released on Sunday, Dr Alan Finkel responded to the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change’s report, which warned that greenhouse gas pollution needs to reach zero by 2050 if the world is to have any hope of stopping global warming at 1.5C.

Finkel said for Australia that did not mean debating pro- and anti-coal stances but using all available technologies to create the best outcome.

“I feel we’ve got to focus on outcomes,” he said. “The outcome is atmospheric emissions. We should use whatever underlying technology are suitable for that.

“People paint themselves into an anti-coal corner or a pro-coal corner but the only question of relevance is to look at the atmospheric emissions.”

The IPCC report was largely dismissed by the government last week, including by the deputy prime minister, Michael McCormack, who referred to it as “some sort of report”.

Australia’s Chief Scientist Alan Finkel: People paint themselves into an anti-coal corner or a pro-coal corner. The only question of relevance is to look at the atmospheric emissions.

MORE: https://t.co/ykweMevBOK #SpeersonSunday pic.twitter.com/9dDS9kLLL4

— Sky News Australia (@SkyNewsAust) October 13, 2018

It was the recommendation that coal-fired power needed to be largely phased out by 2050, to slow global warming to a rate which could save the Great Barrier Reef from complete decline, which raised the government’s ire, with the Coalition remaining firmly committed to coal.

Finkel told Sky the report also said “that we need to look at things like coal-fired power with carbon capture and storage associated with it” and the issue was not as black and white as was being presented.

In an op-ed published on the Conversation website on Friday, Finkel said there was “no time for fatalism” and urged “all decision-makers, in government, industry and the community to listen to the science”.

“We have to look squarely at the goal of a zero-emissions planet, then work out how to get there while maximising our economic growth,” he wrote. “It requires an orderly transition, and that transition will have to be managed over several decades.

“That is why my review of the National Energy Market called for a whole-of-economy emissions reduction strategy for 2050, to be in place by the end of 2020.”

Finkel said no option should be ruled out “without rigorous consideration” and he again repeated the importance natural gas would play in the transition.

“The IPCC has made the same point, not just for Australia, but for the world,” he said in the op-ed, adding: “We have in Australia the abundant resources required to produce clean hydrogen for the global market at a competitive price, on either of the two viable pathways – splitting water using solar and wind electricity, or deriving hydrogen from natural gas and coal in combination with carbon capture and sequestration.

“Building an export hydrogen industry will be a major undertaking. But it will also bring jobs and infrastructure development, largely in regional communities, for decades.

“So the scale of the task is all the more reason to press on today – at the same time as we press on with mining lithium for batteries, clearing the path for electric vehicles, planning more carbon-efficient cities, and so much more.”

Finkel recommended that the government establish a clean energy target in the review he handed to the Turnbull government last year but faced immediate opposition from pro-coal backbenchers, including Tony Abbott and Craig Kelly.

The Finkel review - Politics over science

Those divides within the Liberal party room were a trigger for the leadership spill that ended with Malcolm Turnbull being dumped as prime minister, after the debate about the government’s proposed energy policy conflated with leadership tensions.

It ended with Turnbull quitting parliament and the death of the national energy guarantee, with Scott Morrison ruling out legislating any emissions reductions targets in favour of maintaining them in policy.

The prime minister has continued to insist that Australia will meet its Paris emissions reduction targets “in a canter” despite not having any legislated roadmap to cut atmospheric pollution.

Contributor

Amy Remeikis

The GuardianTramp

Related Content

Article image
'Too early to say' if Coalition will back clean energy target, Frydenberg says
Three-hour meeting fails to resolve government’s position on Finkel review but energy minister denies there’s a backbench revolt

Gabrielle Chan, Paul Karp and Katharine Murphy

13, Jun, 2017 @11:50 AM

Article image
Coalition's Finkel response won't rule out new coal power stations, PM says
After meeting with energy chiefs, Malcolm Turnbull says the Coalition will not set a clean energy target to exclude coal

Katharine Murphy Political editor

30, Aug, 2017 @6:50 AM

Article image
Greens warn Labor not to do clean energy deal that protects coal power
Opposition told to be wary of doing a Finkel review deal with the Coalition that would prolong the life of coal plants

Katharine Murphy Political editor

03, Sep, 2017 @6:00 PM

Article image
Coalition balks on Finkel target but will unveil energy and emissions policy
Guardian Essential poll finds 65% support for doomed target recommended by the chief scientist Alan Finkel

Katharine Murphy Political editor

16, Oct, 2017 @5:00 PM

Article image
Turnbull rejects efforts to ‘dumb down’ energy debate into renewables v coal
A day after Tony Abbott’s call for coal to be prioritised, the prime minister says the debate has seen too much ideology and ‘not enough competence’

Katharine Murphy and Amy Remeikis

21, Sep, 2017 @4:35 AM

Article image
Green steel industry could secure jobs future for Australia's coalmining heartland
Report says steel made with renewable hydrogen could become a multibillion-dollar export industry

Adam Morton Environment editor

10, May, 2020 @5:30 PM

Article image
Liberal MPs pour cold water on inquiry backed by Frydenberg into bank lending for coal projects
Andrew Bragg and Tim Wilson say inquiry is unnecessary because it’s a legitimate ‘matter for those institutions’

Paul Karp

16, Dec, 2020 @6:14 AM

Article image
It's way past time to speak truth to climate arguments this stupid | Lenore Taylor
It’s clearer than ever the economic interests Trump claims to defend can only be served by acting on global warming

Lenore Taylor

03, Jun, 2017 @12:16 AM

Article image
What will fill the hole left by coal?
When mines close in Victoria, local people fear for their future and predict whole towns will die. But if the Coalition and Labor are serious about their climate change targets, are they also ready to replace the lost Australian jobs?

Gay Alcorn and Kate Stanton

28, Jun, 2016 @9:35 PM

Article image
BlueScope Steel backs low emissions target as way to achieve energy balance
Intervention ahead of Finkel review by CEO of one of Australia’s largest manufacturers comes as Tony Abbott warns an LET would be a ‘big mistake’

Paul Karp

07, Jun, 2017 @11:43 PM